Really? You're going to use Wikipedia as a reliable source? I thought everyone on this board was fully aware that this is an establishment outlet?
Edward Jenner and Louis Pasteur are the most GIGANTIC FRAUDS of all time. They were both entirely wrong about everything and what few minor and insignifcant things they seemingly "got right" they stole or plagiarized from their contemporaries. This is something you learn within the first hour of investigating this subject.
Why do you all keep turning to the ESTABLISHMENT to confirm your beliefs anyway? I just don't understand.
Would you like to learn the truth about "the history of virology" or are you okay continuing to hang out with the sheeple herd?
Those are the guys who started looking for the causes of the diseases. They filtered out bacteria and the stuff was still causing disease. They determined that it was particles, not fluid. They determined that it had proteins and nucleic acid. You start with that and research more. Do you just believe someone who says there is no such thing as viruses or bacteria? What kind of a source is that?
I haven't the slightest clue as to what you are referring to here. Whoever "they" are, "they" should have produced an experiment following the scientific method that has been repeated by others to PROVE THIS CLAIM.
Myself and thousands of other people spent the better part of the last half of 2020 looking for such a scientific paper. Nobody was able to find anything even approaching it.
"Proteins" and "Nucleic acids" are like literally the basis of life itself. How does finding these somehow lead you to conclude this proves the existence of boogeyman-viruses?
Shouldn't "Step One' be to find a boogeyman-virus anywhere in reality for starters?
Wouldn't you agree we're wasting our time discussing anything else but this most fundamental "step one" question?
I'm happy to go down the path of "what causes dis-eases" later. I can answer any and all questions you might have on the subject. But first, these "boogeyman-viruses" are going to need to graduate from the realm of unicorns and leprechauns for starters.
Believe it or not, there's a perfectly rational, logical and scientific explanation as to why we get dis-eases. An explanation that has nothing whatsoever to do with "germs", "genes" or "toxins" ta boot.
Nature and reality is simple and elegant. There's nothing complicated about any of it. What's complicated is the mountains of nonsensical mis-education we were all unwittingly subjected to our entire lives. It's in the uniwinding of all this where the tremendous difficult actually rests.
"It's easier to fool someone than to convince them they've been fooled" - Mark Twain.
Truer words have never been spoken. Nobody likes to find out, let alone admit they've been fooled. I didn't like it one bit as I unraveled this, and many other deceptions.
The "easy job" was the cabal's, blaming dozens of dis-eases on imaginary, unproven boogeymen. We all fell for it, yours truly included for the majority of my life.
The "hard job" is convincing everyone they done been duped! Just read through this thread and the many responses you see. How many times did you read "tell me more" or "interesting, but I'm not convinced". I think one person went off and on their own and watched a video. But everybody else is defending the cabal matrix.
It's a darn interesting phenomenon, is it not? I can think of only one explanation as to why people are so quick to defend it....I think Mark Twain gave us the undeniable answer. He was as keen to human nature as anybody in the past couple hundred years in my estimation.
Really? You're going to use Wikipedia as a reliable source? I thought everyone on this board was fully aware that this is an establishment outlet?
Edward Jenner and Louis Pasteur are the most GIGANTIC FRAUDS of all time. They were both entirely wrong about everything and what few minor and insignifcant things they seemingly "got right" they stole or plagiarized from their contemporaries. This is something you learn within the first hour of investigating this subject.
Why do you all keep turning to the ESTABLISHMENT to confirm your beliefs anyway? I just don't understand.
Would you like to learn the truth about "the history of virology" or are you okay continuing to hang out with the sheeple herd?
Those are the guys who started looking for the causes of the diseases. They filtered out bacteria and the stuff was still causing disease. They determined that it was particles, not fluid. They determined that it had proteins and nucleic acid. You start with that and research more. Do you just believe someone who says there is no such thing as viruses or bacteria? What kind of a source is that?
I haven't the slightest clue as to what you are referring to here. Whoever "they" are, "they" should have produced an experiment following the scientific method that has been repeated by others to PROVE THIS CLAIM.
Myself and thousands of other people spent the better part of the last half of 2020 looking for such a scientific paper. Nobody was able to find anything even approaching it.
"Proteins" and "Nucleic acids" are like literally the basis of life itself. How does finding these somehow lead you to conclude this proves the existence of boogeyman-viruses?
Shouldn't "Step One' be to find a boogeyman-virus anywhere in reality for starters?
Wouldn't you agree we're wasting our time discussing anything else but this most fundamental "step one" question?
I'm happy to go down the path of "what causes dis-eases" later. I can answer any and all questions you might have on the subject. But first, these "boogeyman-viruses" are going to need to graduate from the realm of unicorns and leprechauns for starters.
Believe it or not, there's a perfectly rational, logical and scientific explanation as to why we get dis-eases. An explanation that has nothing whatsoever to do with "germs", "genes" or "toxins" ta boot.
Nature and reality is simple and elegant. There's nothing complicated about any of it. What's complicated is the mountains of nonsensical mis-education we were all unwittingly subjected to our entire lives. It's in the uniwinding of all this where the tremendous difficult actually rests.
"It's easier to fool someone than to convince them they've been fooled" - Mark Twain.
Truer words have never been spoken. Nobody likes to find out, let alone admit they've been fooled. I didn't like it one bit as I unraveled this, and many other deceptions.
The "easy job" was the cabal's, blaming dozens of dis-eases on imaginary, unproven boogeymen. We all fell for it, yours truly included for the majority of my life.
The "hard job" is convincing everyone they done been duped! Just read through this thread and the many responses you see. How many times did you read "tell me more" or "interesting, but I'm not convinced". I think one person went off and on their own and watched a video. But everybody else is defending the cabal matrix.
It's a darn interesting phenomenon, is it not? I can think of only one explanation as to why people are so quick to defend it....I think Mark Twain gave us the undeniable answer. He was as keen to human nature as anybody in the past couple hundred years in my estimation.