Just ran into this, maybe that group has a better legal guideline that cites specific clauses for actionability?
The town hall was full. On the screen, the CRB Portal showed the plain-English rule citizens had just ratified: asylum is for people fleeing danger who agree to live under America’s Constitution, not to replace it. The terms were simple and fair—tell the truth, renounce coercion, accept our rights and duties. If later evidence shows the claim was made in bad faith—if the goal was to organize to overturn the constitutional order or import a foreign legal code—status is reviewed with full due process. Proven fraud means return to a safer, culturally compatible country. Compassion remains; deceit does not.
A woman in the back asked the obvious question: “What about protests?” The Portal answered the way Americans do—by drawing a bright line. Peaceful speech stays free; no government may punish belief. But using asylum as a Trojan horse to agitate for replacing the Constitution is not protected by that promise. That is misrepresentation of intent. Under the CRA, citizens—not distant bureaucrats—set this standard, ratified it, and can tighten or relax it as experience teaches.
The room nodded. People here had prayed beside neighbors of every faith, hired new arrivals, and welcomed the persecuted. They would keep doing so. But they would also defend the house they welcomed people into. Under CRA, executive orders and agency rules on asylum cannot slip past the people. Three monthly rejections remove them; ratification keeps them. Propaganda campaigns that try to warp the vote are flagged as tampering, logged, and defeated by sunlight.
By the end of the night, the ledger on the Portal was clear: mercy with honesty, refuge without surrender, free speech without subversion. Government governs. Citizens hold the final say. And America stays America—open to the truthful, firm with the deceitful, anchored by consent.
— Jeff Gunson
President, Citizens Ratification Inc.
I serve probono.
If you believe in citizen oversight of government, repost
Just ran into this, maybe that group has a better legal guideline that cites specific clauses for actionability?
The town hall was full. On the screen, the CRB Portal showed the plain-English rule citizens had just ratified: asylum is for people fleeing danger who agree to live under America’s Constitution, not to replace it. The terms were simple and fair—tell the truth, renounce coercion, accept our rights and duties. If later evidence shows the claim was made in bad faith—if the goal was to organize to overturn the constitutional order or import a foreign legal code—status is reviewed with full due process. Proven fraud means return to a safer, culturally compatible country. Compassion remains; deceit does not.
A woman in the back asked the obvious question: “What about protests?” The Portal answered the way Americans do—by drawing a bright line. Peaceful speech stays free; no government may punish belief. But using asylum as a Trojan horse to agitate for replacing the Constitution is not protected by that promise. That is misrepresentation of intent. Under the CRA, citizens—not distant bureaucrats—set this standard, ratified it, and can tighten or relax it as experience teaches.
The room nodded. People here had prayed beside neighbors of every faith, hired new arrivals, and welcomed the persecuted. They would keep doing so. But they would also defend the house they welcomed people into. Under CRA, executive orders and agency rules on asylum cannot slip past the people. Three monthly rejections remove them; ratification keeps them. Propaganda campaigns that try to warp the vote are flagged as tampering, logged, and defeated by sunlight.
By the end of the night, the ledger on the Portal was clear: mercy with honesty, refuge without surrender, free speech without subversion. Government governs. Citizens hold the final say. And America stays America—open to the truthful, firm with the deceitful, anchored by consent.
— Jeff Gunson President, Citizens Ratification Inc. I serve probono. If you believe in citizen oversight of government, repost