you seem quite knowledgeable. have you personally done the work and recalculated using this process you quoted? otherwise, anyone relying on this "impressive feat" is simply believing a story told which story is subject to biases.
not a scholar of marxism ideas but if we look at sex for example, this to me is a clear attempt by marxists to leave people confused and ultimately divided. alternatively, I can still say that I'm not 100% certain I'm a male but that I'm about as certain as I could be about anything in life that I am a male if this bizarre topic ever came up. being humble about your knowledge when expressed in the right way and to the right people should not diminish your credibility and should, IMO, actually increase it because you can be humble enough to recognize there's a chance you're wrong and that new info could come to light to change your findings. the science is never settled. I have yet to be convinced as to earth's spherical shape and determining this is far from on my priority list to resolve and it shouldn't be on yours to convince anyone. to what end?
while I couldn't be much more convinced that 9/11 was an inside job or that Sandy Hook was a false flag, I still recognize that some evidence could possibly be presented that I need to remain open to that I might prove I've been wrong
Yes, I have personally calculated the acceleration of the twin towers. What more information would you need to 100% believe that you’re male. Are you more convinced that 9/11 was an inside job or are you more convinced that you’re a male? Just wondering, carry on flerfer.
you seem quite knowledgeable. have you personally done the work and recalculated using this process you quoted? otherwise, anyone relying on this "impressive feat" is simply believing a story told which story is subject to biases.
not a scholar of marxism ideas but if we look at sex for example, this to me is a clear attempt by marxists to leave people confused and ultimately divided. alternatively, I can still say that I'm not 100% certain I'm a male but that I'm about as certain as I could be about anything in life that I am a male if this bizarre topic ever came up. being humble about your knowledge when expressed in the right way and to the right people should not diminish your credibility and should, IMO, actually increase it because you can be humble enough to recognize there's a chance you're wrong and that new info could come to light to change your findings. the science is never settled. I have yet to be convinced as to earth's spherical shape and determining this is far from on my priority list to resolve and it shouldn't be on yours to convince anyone. to what end?
while I couldn't be much more convinced that 9/11 was an inside job or that Sandy Hook was a false flag, I still recognize that some evidence could possibly be presented that I need to remain open to that I might prove I've been wrong
Yes, I have personally calculated the acceleration of the twin towers. What more information would you need to 100% believe that you’re male. Are you more convinced that 9/11 was an inside job or are you more convinced that you’re a male? Just wondering, carry on flerfer.