I had a response, then I fat fingered, and I’m not writing it again.
In short, burning down your own history is not the way to save a nation, and it won’t stop the criminals from continuing to do criminal stuff. Ask Guy Fawkes about it and for both yourself and everyone else, please stop being intensely stupid.
Here’s a silly idea for you - how about lawfully putting the criminals in prison, lawfully taking possession of the parliament, creating a warning to future generations against what they’ve done, and then proceeding to rule rightly?
Wouldn’t that be a better outcome?
If you can’t put them in prisonwithoutburning buildings, you aren’t going to do itwithburning buildings, either.
For crying out loud man, go drink some ginseng and think for a second.
Rooks 38 minutes ago +1 / -0
If this was true you would be without issue. So would Napal.
You are attempting to muddle (corrupt?) Good advice with missapropriated platitudes.
.
Is good architecture worth preserving? Of course, always if possible. However, a building is still just a building. Buildings can be rebuilt (Notre-Dame, for example) and they are all the time. Repairs can be done. The US white house and Capitol building have both been rebuilt.
My point is, for the love of a building, the acceptance of evil or corruption should be unacceptable, and a singed building is a small price too pay for freedom.
Those who revolt against tyranny could be seen as impudent to the bystander, but are the heroes of history who stood up to the dictator, the tyrant, and who helped reshape their country.
.
From what I've heard on the news, England and her laws have been ravaged by globalists and the lackeys of evil. Foreigners roam your halls of parliment, and have a stranglehold on your citizens.
The citizens themselves are being arrested just for speaking up, or calling for government action against injustice.
It was the same for Nepal. I would not begrudge either of you to take up and defend your freedoms and very lives. Even if it meant losing a building or two. People are much more important!
If you think England can be saved yet by her own laws, I BEG you to get out from in front of your computer and DO IT.
I would hazard to say better people than both of us have already tried, and failed to do so.
If a match is the only recourse to save the island I'd rather see that than it to be finally and utterly conquered with nary a fight. > Are the people so complacent and brow beaten they won't stand for God, king and country?
Well.
I had a response, then I fat fingered, and I’m not writing it again.
In short, burning down your own history is not the way to save a nation, and it won’t stop the criminals from continuing to do criminal stuff. Ask Guy Fawkes about it and for both yourself and everyone else, please stop being intensely stupid.
Here’s a silly idea for you - how about lawfully putting the criminals in prison, lawfully taking possession of the parliament, creating a warning to future generations against what they’ve done, and then proceeding to rule rightly?
Wouldn’t that be a better outcome?
If you can’t put them in prison without burning buildings, you aren’t going to do it with burning buildings, either.
For crying out loud man, go drink some ginseng and think for a second.