What about the report of Trump admitting being afraid of his life because of Israel's threats? What about the golden pager gift to him? What about the items supposedly found by the secret service that were left after Bibi's visit? What about how close the secret service is still allowing people to get to Trump? You still dont think the manufacturing of a gun disguised as a cell phone matters? The mods dont want us talking about the potential of camouflaged weapons. How is that not a relevant concern?
Comments (14)
sorted by:
I think i might be the only mod on right now.
But i'm going to make it clear to you folks: i will be removing posts that send this board on wild goose chases and i've seen a few.
I have seen 2-3 videos of the Charlie Kirk shooting. We have a few links with wild goose chase vibes already: this one and this one
I am not buying it that the "guy in the white to charlie's right held his hand up just at this time and he died" because the hole was on the Charlie's left side of his neck. Plus, no one has so much as shown a picture of that guy in the white holding a gun, or even a cell phone looking gun.
So i'm nipping that wild goose chase on the bud. If any of you can get a CLEAR PICTURE of him holding something that can so much as resemble a gun, present it.
The most convincing take we have right now is this:
https://greatawakening.win/p/1AR0LRgJZj/charlie-kirks-body-armor-ricoche/c/
But even that i can't confirm
What i'm saying is, i'm open to anything, but we aren't flooding the board with a single wild goose chase.
I presented a video of the gun in question and you removed it. It seems important to be aware of this kind of camouflaged weapon, whether it could have been used in this assassination or not.
I told you to present the CLEAR PICTURE of that gun being used
At this point that gun is a speculation on a speculation that there's no clear evidence there's even a gun in use
Seems to me we have been speculating about everything since Q first posted. Speculating is part of research. Did Q ask us to believe what we've been told or to go out and research for truth? While researching, we ask many questions. This is what Bia2020 is doing.
4 years and 5000 points? Oh, last spoke 21 days ago, and before that 3 months? yeah i'm speculating you're a shill and noting your account too, thanks.
OHHHH!!! ho ho ho! when i noted your account, our other fascinating mods had already noticed you were a glowing shill over the years, so you're permbanned.
That adds even more weight to the take that this is a bs take. you little shitheads got caught.
And I presented video of the gun itself because people need to know that kind of technology exists.
Which is step 2 of the wild goose chase. Focus on step 1: can you get us a reasonable doubt that that was a gun? I'm not buying that his hands just moved that way at that time is a gun, it could be anything.
Start pouring over the videos again please.
I feel there's far more optics than we can realize.
I know I haven't had a chance to see Trump anywhere since his campaign tour. You think about that, nobody can plan anything. Nobody knows where he will be. If it's even him there. You see him walking into ufc, well we have enough technology to legitimately say he could have never been to a single fight.
Cellphone guns exist. Carry Four .22lr bullets. Firing is merely touching a keypad number for each round.
There may not be a clear shot of a cell phone gun but there is NO DOUBT to me that there is CLEAR recoil in the mans hand.
What were the alleged items found in the White House after Bibi's visit?
Look up the Max Blumenthal/Tim Dillon conversation
If the security for our government isn't on highest alert and all bases covered by now, this plan was initiated half-cocked.
Butler still makes zero fucking sense. We just gonna let that one go under the rug though yeah?
Do you remember when someone threw a cell phone his direction after a rally? Never put that and the beeper thing together but would be really bad