Hunters, Delta Force, Range Masters Etc. etc. have all opined with hearing large caliber, ITS A .308 ! ETC. ,etc. but thats not the case. Nobody came forward talking about a small calibre in and out without the MAX blood spread that was expected.
Until now. This was a small calibre .22 precision passenger side entrance , small driver side , with, gush , gush effect. Its physics man, or else we have a mask and skin suit squb job. Thats it. No splatter on the wall, no dramatic exit wound. .22
Until next time, its a white hat presentation so relax, normies have to wake up.
I have thought from the beginning that the apparent gunshot wound is all wrong for the sniper story.
It's also on the wrong side, with the apparent exit wound towards the shooter.
If it was a .22 it could have been an air pistol. That would explain the lack of a muzzle flash in the suspicious video of the bodyguard.
The usual routine for this is to have multiple shooters and one set up as the fall guy.
Many people don't realize the power of a one-shot air-pistol even at .177. I hear scoffing noises from the .45 crowd.
One can kill vermin and even hares with them. And it appears, humans, at close range - where there is a will, etc. Yeah. Even pellet pushers need to observe gun-safety, for obvious reasons. A small pellet can travel remarkably fast through flesh and bone - just saying.
That's why people have those types of guns on farms - in many countries, one does not even need a fire-arms licence, and the gun will do fine - accurate, fast, and quieter, compared to rim-fire, for example. But one has to load one pellet at a time. No problem. One only needs one pellet, hey.
Re: stopping power - in an assassination, the subject is generally not running towards the assailant. So, it's basically not that situation, of needing to stop an aggressive Filipino (oh and that's not racist - it's the reason the US Military adopted the '45, rather than the standard issue .38. The Arnis-trained guys were able to absorb many bullets, and keep charging with their double knives - so the military needed that magical stopping power).
In an assassination, all one needs is penetration power. There's plenty of that in an low-calibre airgun.
The small calibre makes it easier to hide the barrel, as well.
Also, the tech for those types of (scoff -) AIR-pistols has increased exponentially in recent years. There are so many advantages to taking up this sport, and the guns are very imaginative these days, and can be made to be hyper-accurate - with some know-how. And guess what? Those wee .177 are HARD to find, if one is hunting the grounds for a traditional 30 cal rim-fire bullet, that is. One could easily tread it into the ground, for example.
POI: Air guns can have magazines, too.
True, but not in all countries.
It's the US, we can have air machine guns and switchblade knives in most states. Switchblade were legal to own but illegal to carry here in Oklahoma,but since it's legal to carry a handgun with no permit,those laws made no sense and they changed them.
Some backward countries are taking away rights,but we are increasing them.
Sure thing. Just saying that airguns are a possiblity in this case. Don't know why people downdoot me for just sayin
Don't know,airgun are capable of doing it.
They could also have airgun with more power designed for this that are not avaliable to the public.
Maybe it was an objection to the Filipinos who had to have bigger bullets?
It's rough, but that IS the history of .45 army issue handguns.,
ding ding ding this!
I ran across this video yesterday:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/knMwocZLpGwF
It took me awhile to see what was going on and I spent a lot of time analyzing it by slowing down the video as much as possible, and maximizing the screen size.
The bodyguard that you mention -- the one that can be seen fully off to Charlie's right side and one of two bodyguards who were seen signaling -- immediately runs towards Charlie after the shot. Oddly, he doesn't go to Charlie, but kneels down behind the table and appears to grab something tube-like in his hands and pulls it apart. The argument being made in the video is that this is a tube containing pressurized "blood" that needs to be disconnected before they can remove Charlie from the scene. Note that the tables surround Charlie on three sides, thus blocking most people from seeing what is going on behind the table.
So, if this "bodyguard" is "in" on the hoax, then the hand signals that were given prior to him being "shot" may have been the "go" signal to whomever was tasked with firing the "shot."
Just ran across this post from u/NeilS :
https://greatawakening.win/p/1AR0QF9vgv/this-is-interesting-/c/
"Eyal Yakobitch posts evidence that The Chief Rabbi of Israel sent a letter about Charlie Kirk’s death on September 2nd, a week BEFORE the assassination."
So, the WHs would have had from September 2 - 10 -- 8 days -- to develop their plan, assuming they didn't know sooner.
Charlie was doing the ground-work to run for President in the future. He still had some ways to go, but his organization was well on the way, with a massive voter base and lots of chapters in his org..
So, somebody killed a future president - is the narrative.
What will happen when the WH decide to say: Haha fooled you - here he is!
Actually, I think that won't happen. If it is a WH operation, then they will never admit it.
Thats a very astute concept of a future President, thanks for that, you probably just shook off my stale, bad attitude after a few days. Thank You !
Correction:.380 acp
The chaos is strong with the information that is being released. Much of it doesn’t add-up. I think it is intentional in order to hide what is going on - WH or BH….. Currently leaning WH op.
That campus had cameras everywhere, there is one right behind Charlie that was ‘removed’ shortly after.
When there is a traffic fatality, they shut down the roads. A homicide gets crime tape. None of that here? Hmmmm….
We are served potato-cam images and chomp them down with the cheese of the media - yum!
Where is the beef?