Here’s a long video you might find interesting, if you like scientific inquiry into miracles. They used an innovative imaging technique on the photo negatives. The assertions are genuinely astounding.
To the believer no proof is necessary. To the skeptic no proof is sufficient.
When Thomas insists on probing the wound, as brilliantly depicted by Caravaggio, Thomas says “My Lord and my God I see and believe” and receives the rebuke “Blessed are those who have believed but not seen.” That’s my rebuke too. I’m deeply repentant of my former skepticism.
I hope you’ll watch that video and get back to me on your opinion of it. It’s not short. There’s a lot they reveal by orthoscopic imaging of the negative. For examples; A strip removed and rewoven into the edge of the cloth, probably used to help remove him from the cross. A really nice snakeskin belt, and the under garment he was wearing. The nails still embedded. The crown of thorns identified by species. A piece of jewelry on a small chain attached to a sort of safety pin holding the face cloth in a crumpled mass like a small pillow. The reason for this is also explained. They elaborate with careful comparative study of the Suderium of Oviedo which shows it having been so pierced. Then, they show actual movement of the hands and body position consistent with breathing. All this in apparent stroboscopic multiple exposures like timed bursts of X-rays.
It’s quite compelling. That’s not even the most mind blowing stuff either. I won’t describe the conjecture they propose for how the image must have been singed into the cloth. I’d be interested in your assessment. It’s not easy viewing, and seems to have been of Italian origin. It’s not, imho fakey, like an alien autopsy video or something. I’ve watched it several times.
Or let it pass as inconsequential and irrelevant because you’re already convinced and need not concern yourself with examining evidence, with which sentiment I heartily agree. Either way, Lord have mercy.
Thanks duck. Can’t claim to have originated these ideas.
https://youtu.be/KgCaTPv1_uY?si=RGAUYhaDKa40hJxs
Here’s a long video you might find interesting, if you like scientific inquiry into miracles. They used an innovative imaging technique on the photo negatives. The assertions are genuinely astounding.
To the believer no proof is necessary. To the skeptic no proof is sufficient.
To the believer no proof is necessary. To the skeptic no proof is sufficient.
Yup, all the proof I need is in my heart, and in my first hand witness of the miracles Christ has performed in my my life.
When Thomas insists on probing the wound, as brilliantly depicted by Caravaggio, Thomas says “My Lord and my God I see and believe” and receives the rebuke “Blessed are those who have believed but not seen.” That’s my rebuke too. I’m deeply repentant of my former skepticism.
I hope you’ll watch that video and get back to me on your opinion of it. It’s not short. There’s a lot they reveal by orthoscopic imaging of the negative. For examples; A strip removed and rewoven into the edge of the cloth, probably used to help remove him from the cross. A really nice snakeskin belt, and the under garment he was wearing. The nails still embedded. The crown of thorns identified by species. A piece of jewelry on a small chain attached to a sort of safety pin holding the face cloth in a crumpled mass like a small pillow. The reason for this is also explained. They elaborate with careful comparative study of the Suderium of Oviedo which shows it having been so pierced. Then, they show actual movement of the hands and body position consistent with breathing. All this in apparent stroboscopic multiple exposures like timed bursts of X-rays.
It’s quite compelling. That’s not even the most mind blowing stuff either. I won’t describe the conjecture they propose for how the image must have been singed into the cloth. I’d be interested in your assessment. It’s not easy viewing, and seems to have been of Italian origin. It’s not, imho fakey, like an alien autopsy video or something. I’ve watched it several times.
Or let it pass as inconsequential and irrelevant because you’re already convinced and need not concern yourself with examining evidence, with which sentiment I heartily agree. Either way, Lord have mercy.