Vietnam just deactivated 86 million bank accounts overnight. No warning, no grace period. Individuals who failed to submit biometric data were immediately denied access. This is not speculation. This is applied state-level biometric enforcement. Don’t assume this is “too extreme to happen here. - The Great Awakening

Vietnam just deactivated 86 million bank accounts overnight. No warning, no grace period. Individuals who failed to submit biometric data were immediately denied access. This is not speculation. This is applied state-level biometric enforcement. Don’t assume this is “too extreme to happen here. (twitter.com) 🚔 Crime & DeepState 💸

posted 269 days ago by seernewday 269 days ago by seernewday +139 / -0

36 comments

36 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (36)

sorted by:

▲ 4 ▼

– LordLag1 4 points 269 days ago +4 / -0

Hate to be that guy but I call BS on the way this is being reported. Vietnam barely has 86 million people and not all of them would be of banking age.

I'm 100% onboard with not furthering the beast system but they should tell us what really happened rather than try to hype it up with crazy numbers.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 4 ▼

– Mithrednir 4 points 269 days ago +4 / -0

You know people can have multiple bank accounts, right?

The initiative targets accounts lacking verified biometric data, which the SBV claims are highly vulnerable to scams and fraud, including AI-driven facial spoofing. As of the start of September, over 86 million accounts were deactivated, while 113 million personal accounts and 711,000 organizational accounts were successfully verified.

The requirement for biometric verification applies not only to account registration but also to online transfers exceeding 10 million VND (about $379), with additional checks for transactions over 20 million VND (about $758).

Foreigners and holders of inactive accounts have reported significant difficulties, with some needing to travel back to Vietnam for in-person verification, as remote solutions are limited.

The closures are linked to broader reforms, including the upcoming January 2026 implementation of the Law on Digital Technology Industry, which grants legal recognition to crypto assets under strict anti-money laundering and cybersecurity rules.

The move has sparked debate, with Bitcoin advocates arguing it underscores the risks of centralized finance and the importance of self-custody solutions like Bitcoin, citing past banking restrictions in Lebanon, Turkey, and Nigeria.

Don’t mind us bitcoiners, we’re just over here being totally right, again.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– LordLag1 2 points 269 days ago +2 / -0

Yes aware people can have multiple accounts. Also aware there were millions of dead accounts on the books. The guy in the clip is still sensationalizing the situation. Should have said X amount of people refused to comply, that would be useful.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– TaQo 1 point 269 days ago +1 / -0

John says BTC is worthless: https://www.bitchute.com/video/Cgt4A247srQ3

I agree. It has practically zero utility. I can't go into town a buy gas, groceries, building materials, eat at a non-franchise restaurant and pay in BTC.

Therefore, while it trades at $100k+, it is in all actuality, completely worthless. You have it ...Now what?

Besides, I don't want everyone knowing what I bought, when and what I've got. That's just dumb. Everybody thinks that's a security feature - it's not... quite the opposite.

Oh yeah.... and the power went out for a week straight. Now what? Farmers don't even take credit cards by me. BTC? Pfft... might as well be a cheque from a bank on Mars. Ghey spelling intentional

You might want to rethink your bingo card...

permalink parent save report block reply