It was contained in an interview I read decades ago. My subconscious memory suggests it was Omni magazine but I wouldn't stake the house on it. Or maybe it was book I used to own on the subject. A lot of years under the bridge since reading it, but I remember, because I was researching the topic after having just read the Dune books and had surmised the possibility as a good one.
The article mentioned also that some remote viewers were able to locate underground bases where horrific experiments were conducted. I'll try to rummage around and see if I can relocate, but I have a feeling it will be scrubbed/missing from internet.
This 'Time Nexus' you speak of is the key. I do it myself ....really. I call it my 'cootie-catcher' method of future paths.
Remember the 'cootie-catcher' where you would fold a piece of paper into a four sided cup that you would write letters or numbers or words on....then you'd put your fingers into the cup and do a scissors motion to provide 'choice results' after asking someone for a number for example. It goes on, but the point is actually the subject of a conversation I had with a cognitive scientist about the illusion of choice. I agreed with his statement that cognitive decisions most always come down to a choice between two....A or B.....not a nearly endless chain of possibilties. More a linear continuation of choices between A and (not A).
Utilizing this method, Future A is 'chosen' and that path analysed until another choice is presented. This creates a recordable future pathway like a circuit board with decisions as 1/0 or on/off. If/when that path hits a point of improbability, one can go back to the point where the 'wrong' choice was made and create an alternate 'path'. In this way, Future Proves Past. Like in the Schroedinger's Cat experiment, each 'future line' exists a potential reality until a choice ('observation') is made which then locks that potential into actual reality.
My exploits into this allowed me to become involved peripherally with modern 'String Theory' as critic who changed its name, due to my seeing it as purposefully misguided, attempting to substitute 'multiple simultaneously occurring REALITIES in place of the more proper POTENTIALS.
My practice of it has been an eye-opening success...which kind of makes me say......' it takes one to know one."
The friends I have left (kek) have no idea how I've been able to 'see things coming' even decades before Q and looking glass technology using computers to calculate the odds.
However that success depends largely on accuracy of input of data .....the wider the inference the less chance of error in finding that 'Golden Path.'
All that said, it pays to remember that all is fluid, nothing is set.
Thank you, I truly appreciate the excellent comment.
It was contained in an interview I read decades ago. My subconscious memory suggests it was Omni magazine but I wouldn't stake the house on it. Or maybe it was book I used to own on the subject. A lot of years under the bridge since reading it, but I remember, because I was researching the topic after having just read the Dune books and had surmised the possibility as a good one.
The article mentioned also that some remote viewers were able to locate underground bases where horrific experiments were conducted. I'll try to rummage around and see if I can relocate, but I have a feeling it will be scrubbed/missing from internet.
This 'Time Nexus' you speak of is the key. I do it myself ....really. I call it my 'cootie-catcher' method of future paths.
Remember the 'cootie-catcher' where you would fold a piece of paper into a four sided cup that you would write letters or numbers or words on....then you'd put your fingers into the cup and do a scissors motion to provide 'choice results' after asking someone for a number for example. It goes on, but the point is actually the subject of a conversation I had with a cognitive scientist about the illusion of choice. I agreed with his statement that cognitive decisions most always come down to a choice between two....A or B.....not a nearly endless chain of possibilties. More a linear continuation of choices between A and (not A).
Utilizing this method, Future A is 'chosen' and that path analysed until another choice is presented. This creates a recordable future pathway like a circuit board with decisions as 1/0 or on/off. If/when that path hits a point of improbability, one can go back to the point where the 'wrong' choice was made and create an alternate 'path'. In this way, Future Proves Past. Like in the Schroedinger's Cat experiment, each 'future line' exists a potential reality until a choice ('observation') is made which then locks that potential into actual reality.
My exploits into this allowed me to become involved peripherally with modern 'String Theory' as critic who changed its name, due to my seeing it as purposefully misguided, attempting to substitute 'multiple simultaneously occurring REALITIES in place of the more proper POTENTIALS.
My practice of it has been an eye-opening success...which kind of makes me say......' it takes one to know one."
The friends I have left (kek) have no idea how I've been able to 'see things coming' even decades before Q and looking glass technology using computers to calculate the odds.
However that success depends largely on accuracy of input of data .....the wider the inference the less chance of error in finding that 'Golden Path.'
All that said, it pays to remember that all is fluid, nothing is set.
Thank you, I truly appreciate the excellent comment.