I appreciate Candace wanting to get to the bottom of this, but she makes a number of leaps and is too definitive in saying things like there is NO other explanation that makes sense and that "they are lying to us about EVERYTHING, literally EVERYTHING." Just way too certain for someone who in the same breath admits that she is still learning things here.
The guy who saw the shooter from a large distance says he saw tactical clothes, a mask and a different weapon than the grandfather's gun. She really shouldn't take that account as verified truth. She should consider it a data point at best. The actual ballistics will be more telling than that eyewitness's distant account. Etc.
I appreciate Candace wanting to get to the bottom of this, but she makes a number of leaps and is too definitive in saying things like there is NO other explanation that makes sense and that "they are lying to us about EVERYTHING, literally EVERYTHING." Just way too certain for someone who in the same breath admits that she is still learning things here.
The guy who saw the shooter from a large distance says he saw tactical clothes, a mask and a different weapon than the grandfather's gun. She really shouldn't take that account as verified truth. She should consider it a data point at best. The actual ballistics will be more telling than that eyewitness's distant account. Etc.