1
WinsAnon 1 point ago +1 / -0

After the Democratic National Convention has chosen its nominee, if Biden were to drop out, the DNC leadership gets to unilaterally decide on the successor. I promise you that’s what will happen.

https://ballotpedia.org/State_laws_and_party_rules_on_replacing_a_presidential_nominee,_2024#Replacing_a_nominee_between_the_national_convention_and_the_election

2
WinsAnon 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think Obama is locking down support for Michelle to step in for Biden.

3
WinsAnon 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just very strange that the judge would require her lover to withdraw, but not her. If there was impropriety at all, it was by BOTH of them and not just him.

Frankly, the much bigger impropriety was by her.

2
WinsAnon 2 points ago +2 / -0

Since the opinion goes beyond just overturning Colorado's attempt to keep Trump off the ballot, and instead explains that only the US Congress can do that, it follows that the majority believed weaponized prosecutors would try to gain a "conviction" against Trump for insurrection somewhere and then states would use that precedent to argue they have grounds now to keep Trump off the ballots.

So the majority knew that lawfare is a thing and they tried to head it off.

And the concurring minority cried foul because they too were acknowledging in their protestations that they didn't want to neuter the prosecutors.

Our SCOTUS is saying they see the lawfare and the conservatives are trying to stop it while the liberals are trying to encourage it.

16
WinsAnon 16 points ago +16 / -0

To me it’s impossible to consider that these two events are not connected.

5
WinsAnon 5 points ago +5 / -0

If I was Trump, when I get back to the White House I would say it was hidden all this time so he never has to admit he truly has it and ignores the subpoenas.

-1
WinsAnon -1 points ago +1 / -2

This story and others like it point out what a terrible job Trump’s lawyer did. After the verdict we’re seeing things that should’ve been presented as evidence during the trial.

A bad lawyer is not grounds for appeal.

8
WinsAnon 8 points ago +9 / -1

Because they don’t want a wealthy conservative to buy it and find all the wiring that has no purpose but to deliver power to hidden cameras and the like.

1
WinsAnon 1 point ago +1 / -0

But they are skyrocketing. All my rates are going up. I have a client that owns lots of apartment buildings. Gos insurance went up 125% this year, an annual increase of over $1 million.

2
WinsAnon 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s now an old trick of the left. They make people believe the polls are close so they can cheat the result and many people will therefore believe the outcome is legit.

2
WinsAnon 2 points ago +2 / -0

The PC woke police eating their own.

The college presidents helped create the monster that is turning in them now.

There is obviously no higher learning going on in that camp.

11
WinsAnon 11 points ago +11 / -0

I read the story about the runoff election on Fox. And they never once mentioned the margin. Fox is so compromised.

8
WinsAnon 8 points ago +8 / -0

Tell me why a guy with his own planes flies 36 times on another guy’s plane? It doesn’t happen. Unless the other guy’s plane has lots of underaged sex slaves on it.

view more: Next ›