https://makisw.substack.com/p/news-bombshell-study-claim-that-covid
The actual published study: https://cdn.fortunejournals.com/articles/a-step-by-step-evaluation-of-the-claim-that-covid-19-vaccines-saved-millions-of-lives-6254.pdf
The study's Abstract:
Concerns about potential harms of COVID-19 vaccines are often met with the widespread claim that the vaccines saved millions of lives. A recent U.S. Senate hearing on vaccine safety (May 21, 2025) even opened with the declaration that “there is no scientific question about that fact.” This article offers a structured, step-by-step evaluation of the empirical basis for that claim, building on the authors’ prior comprehensive investigation. Step 1 analyzes the mathematical models behind the ‘millions saved’ claim, including the one cited in the Senate hearing. Step 2 revisits the collapse of the initial narrative concerning vaccine efficacy against infection and transmission, which served as the cornerstone of the mass vaccination campaign. Step 3 examines the revised justification that followed: the claim that vaccines continued to protect against severe illness and death. This step draws on data from randomized trials (3.1), observational studies (3.2), and official public health dashboards (3.3). Taken together, this analysis shows that the ‘millions saved’ narrative lacks empirical support (readers are strongly encouraged to consult the full article and assess the evidence). To understand how such an unsupported narrative could emerge and dominate, Step 4 traces the direct mechanisms behind its rise: methodological flaws (4.1), misrepresentation and misinterpretation of findings (4.2, 4.3), and suppression of dissenting voices (4.4). By focusing on transient signals of success while overlooking concerns about efficacy and safety, a fragile assertion appears to have solidified into a widely accepted belief that shaped global health policy.
Buddy, you responded to yourself here. C'mon.
Please show me a law that says that "gain of function is a crime against humanity".
Summary of S.3012 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): Viral Gain of Function Research Moratorium Act
Releasing a virus is a crime against humanity. Fauci funded the Wuhan Lab that released the virus made with the gain of function ban by Congress.
This is a bill, not a law: https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/3012/all-actions
And it is not about "crimes against humanity". You seem confused.
Where did you learn this?
NIH funded Eco Health and Peter Danzak who were funding gain of function at Wuhan Lab. Select Committee.
“The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2” publication — which was used repeatedly by public health officials and the media to discredit the lab leak theory — was prompted by Dr. Fauci to push the preferred narrative that COVID-19 originated naturally.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/lab-leak-true-origins-of-covid-19/
Funding someone who then does something else that is not authorized by the funding (even if that's true) is not a crime.
It is certainly possible that the lab leak theory is correct, but we don't know and don't have the collaboration with the Chinese required to do full forensics.