The sedevacantist position is that he is not a pope
Non-Catholics ("Globalists" or whoever) became "clergy" until there was enough of them to elect a "pope" "of their own"
Kind of like how the 2020 u.s. presidential election was stolen
They then started changing things like with the Second Vatican Council, getting rid of the "latin mass", and all kinds of other traditions
Those who identify as Catholic worldwide I think have to come to a consensus that this is no longer Catholicism and then a pope has to be elected to carry on Catholicism like it was in the first half of the 20th century
Many people were excitedly saying "leo" would be a "conservative" but a lot of "traditional Catholics" have already seen how previous "popes" like john paul ii and benedict xvi were not "conservative" and so were not expecting "leo" to deviate from the radical course they've been going on since 1958
The sedevacantist position is that he is not a pope
Non-Catholics ("Globalists" or whoever) became "clergy" until there was enough of them to elect a "pope" "of their own"
Kind of like how the 2020 u.s. presidential election was stolen
They then started changing things like with the Second Vatican Council, getting rid of the "latin mass", and all kinds of other traditions
Those who identify as Catholic worldwide I think have to come to a consensus that this is no longer Catholicism and then a pope has to be elected to carry on Catholicism like it was in the first half of the 20th century
Many people were excitedly saying "leo" would be a "conservative" but a lot of "traditional Catholics" have already seen how previous "popes" like john paul ii and benedict xvi were not "conservative" and so were not expecting "leo" to deviate from the radical course they've been going on since 1958