I've seen it. While interesting, it's a very shaky proof and there are explanations for it.
I'm concerned at how many responses I received that can be distilled down to "Well it's OBVIOUSLY Q+".
It's not and while I begrudge no one for paying attention to that account, people should be taking any info from that account with a very large pinch of salt.
That account has predicted many, many things over the past couple of years, none of which has happened. I have yet to see anyone on GAW actually do a post mortem on the many things predicted by that account. It's not accurate.
Well, I didn't say Q+, but said Trump team. Could be Scavino running it.
I would welcome someone to analyze that accounts' posts and show what predictions it has made that failed. I don't remember it making specific predictions, just posts that point to certain things.
I've seen it. While interesting, it's a very shaky proof and there are explanations for it.
I'm concerned at how many responses I received that can be distilled down to "Well it's OBVIOUSLY Q+".
It's not and while I begrudge no one for paying attention to that account, people should be taking any info from that account with a very large pinch of salt.
That account has predicted many, many things over the past couple of years, none of which has happened. I have yet to see anyone on GAW actually do a post mortem on the many things predicted by that account. It's not accurate.
Well, I didn't say Q+, but said Trump team. Could be Scavino running it.
I would welcome someone to analyze that accounts' posts and show what predictions it has made that failed. I don't remember it making specific predictions, just posts that point to certain things.