When you think about it, I think the "No Deals" message has/had multiple purposes.
One, to encourage patriots and anons etc, by emphasizing a determination to seek real, tangible justice.
Two, to emphasize to those working on the dark side about the seriousness of the White Hats in their determination to pursue real justice.
BUT, I also think that it's not a hard and fast literal approach. Consider DJT. How much he pushes, scolds, threatens, receives, praises, etc, all to move the people and groups he's working with to a specific conclusion point. After all, art of the deal.
So, I do not think its helpful to overly attach to the idea of "No Deals" in a literal sense. The objective is the Win. It is to dismantle the system of systems, the false system of slavery and control, and liberate the People and the government, etc, the world. Deals will be made if they help this goal.
For example, letting the remaining Hamas leadership 'walk away'. Is this justice? Letting Netanyahu claim a victory, narrative wise? Is this justice? No. But the way to accomplish the peace and dismantle the framework of perpetual conflict is, as DJT has shown, is to corner your opponents into a place where they MUST accept the deal you offer them. They get to walk away, but you get to dissolve and remove their whole system of control and perpetual conflict.
I think there are some who are so guilty that full accountability MUST take place. I.e Obama, Brennan, others.
But I also believe that there are many, many who will be given a deal if they choose to step aside and let the ugly control and deception machine to be imploded more quickly. I think there has to be a balance.
Some who committed treason might be given lighter sentences if it speeds the end towards the goal. Others will not.
It's important, in my view, to keep the eyes on the goal. There can be no forward movement without accountability, but the end goal is to gain the full victory and achieve liberation. Those executing the plan have to keep this in mind. Frogs here do have the luxury, in personal choice, to ignore that if they want, but those in core positions of responsibility cannot.
I'm assuming that all of those involved should be hanged for committing treason? Because that's what I'm getting from this.
NO DEALS.
There are 11 drops with NO DEALS
This 👇 is the last one
u/#q2568
When you think about it, I think the "No Deals" message has/had multiple purposes.
One, to encourage patriots and anons etc, by emphasizing a determination to seek real, tangible justice.
Two, to emphasize to those working on the dark side about the seriousness of the White Hats in their determination to pursue real justice.
BUT, I also think that it's not a hard and fast literal approach. Consider DJT. How much he pushes, scolds, threatens, receives, praises, etc, all to move the people and groups he's working with to a specific conclusion point. After all, art of the deal.
So, I do not think its helpful to overly attach to the idea of "No Deals" in a literal sense. The objective is the Win. It is to dismantle the system of systems, the false system of slavery and control, and liberate the People and the government, etc, the world. Deals will be made if they help this goal.
For example, letting the remaining Hamas leadership 'walk away'. Is this justice? Letting Netanyahu claim a victory, narrative wise? Is this justice? No. But the way to accomplish the peace and dismantle the framework of perpetual conflict is, as DJT has shown, is to corner your opponents into a place where they MUST accept the deal you offer them. They get to walk away, but you get to dissolve and remove their whole system of control and perpetual conflict.
I think there are some who are so guilty that full accountability MUST take place. I.e Obama, Brennan, others.
But I also believe that there are many, many who will be given a deal if they choose to step aside and let the ugly control and deception machine to be imploded more quickly. I think there has to be a balance.
Some who committed treason might be given lighter sentences if it speeds the end towards the goal. Others will not.
It's important, in my view, to keep the eyes on the goal. There can be no forward movement without accountability, but the end goal is to gain the full victory and achieve liberation. Those executing the plan have to keep this in mind. Frogs here do have the luxury, in personal choice, to ignore that if they want, but those in core positions of responsibility cannot.