Tesla was Eastern Orthodox, so you're allowed to talk to him and he might even get back to you on it.
I'm allowed to reveal a few things about time travel but obviously all time travelers are agreed on the actual time when Massive Disclosure happens and (checks watch) it hasn't happened yet. Once it happens I'll be there to help guide.
Always beware claims that "I've been time traveling since X". What they mean is that some present, or future, event allowed them to time travel back to X and then they backdated their claim. For instance, if (when) the future me gave the 1971 me a book then I too could claim I've been time traveling since 1971 but it was actually the future me.
The guy you're quoting is obviously twisting things just a little to take the heat off the real time travelers, much like flat earthers take the heat off the real Antarctica research. You can't actually send a book back in time you can only send the contents. All you need is a reception frequency in the past that can see the book you're sending. The time travelers don't want you to know how easy those past receptor fields are to find as they are regular constructs of the activity of any human mind. We just don't think of them as such so we don't see the time travelers talking to us.
The part about a physical transporter is just all bogus, Star Trek meets The Prestige. It's not done with big tech constructions and portals, it's more like flying, you just catch an updraft called a wormhole and your body will hold itself together if you get a strong enough one. They're everywhere too. I have a little trouble doing it (kind of like hula hooping) but I know people who have done it.
u/Greekish is correct that time is a construct that can be dispensed with as an explanation. I'm still working on how Minkowski (who was smart enough to teach Einstein) differed from Euclid on how to insert time into the dimensions; that's my current avocational pursuit. That means there are two easy ways to construct time and they roughly correspond to the static forever and the experiential flow (the future potential pouring into the past actual as human anticipation becomes human memory). But there are other more exotic ways, and the Big Bang and black holes give hints; these are the ones that allow time travel. When I grow up I'm going to be a black hole miner. But first I must master that Minkowski spacetime.
Station identification: Remember, I larp as high-effort high-IQ. Let's continue having fun with it.
Yes, CTCs are wormholes, you just need to open up any of those M-theory dimensions beyond the Planck distance. The reason these paradoxes don't happen is that there's only one live universe we're dealing with (Novikov) and those paradoxes commit the common fallacy of mistaking the multiverse for true time travel. (If you want multiple timelines you need a multiverse and time travel will not help you; I have less experience with those.) Godel proved that he was always right except when he was wrong, that's incompleteness; so it's true that there are always incomplete aspects to time travel, but they don't affect the real practice at all just like infinity doesn't affect computing. In particular when you send the information back, the unexpected egg (apparent paradox) demonstrates that the recipients cannot know completely that it's legitimate and that's why it's sufficient to transmit substantially rather than perfectly. Cassandra in mythology knew "perfectly", which makes her a goddess rather than a human, but her listeners could not know perfectly (and so in that exaggeration they refused even substantial knowledge). Anyway, that also explains the evidence, namely it's so ubiquitous that it's been mistaken for other phenomena and ignored. The evidence for time travel is then something you can accumulate substantially but (as to any event) not perfectly until the event is completed and the loop closed; for instance, the (future) Official Disclosure event won't be believed if I gave you the correct date so it doesn't matter, but when it happens the past confirmations will all be there.
Anyway the wormhole mechanics for time travel are (as I said) about the bits not the atoms, which are processed via spacetime entanglement. The wormhole mechanics for teleportation are the atoms not the bits (unlike the imaginations given here), so they are a different story and they are processed via higher-dimensional transfer just like in Flatland.
"Euclidean" is a bit of a retronym for non-Lorentzian spacetime because you need a word for when time is additive instead of subtractive and so that's what I called it even though applying Euclid to time was a later development. Time follows all the Euclidean postulates anyway so it's natural to say. I don't say Minkowski is dispensable, rather he and Euclid (Newton) are two primary ways to view time and I don't have a good enumeration on all the major ways yet. For instance, the life review of an NDE is clearly a transtemporal event.
Black holes are not effective time travelers. (Yet.) They permit limited travel via Hawking radiation (I highly distrust the proposed alternative, exotic matter), which is basically the completely least efficient method of time travel; if you trace the antiparticle back in time you find it again at a much earlier instant outside the past event horizon. Black holes are important because they teach us about building white holes, which are the real winners. I suppose white holes could be effectively harnessed for time travel (hadn't thought about it) but they are mostly for zero-point energy tapping and may also allow more accurate multiverse access than otherwise. (Hartle found a theoretical Planck-sized closed universe attached to the Big Bang white hole via "quantum" tunneling, so that may be an example of how to connect the multiverse; it's still theory, and could be wrong, but is a great idea so far, better than say Tipler.)
What I claim to know about physics is that Einstein was right and "quantum" physics is bunk because its descriptions are deceptive even as its math is mostly right. It's deconstructionist; the cat is either alive or dead, never both (that would be multiverse again instead, not "quantum fluctuation"). I suppose I need a grant so I can work out the full math instead of keeping it at the conceptual level. (Also I've pointed out evidence of Magueijo lightspeed decay, which has the benefit of changing all kinds of math and bringing it into agreement with young-earth creationism.) But when I need to bring in those anomalies I try to be direct about them.
I had to look up Henri-Louis Bergson, yes, that's a philosophical description of xyz-t spacetime as opposed to xyz+t. But in xyz+t, in Planck units, Hartle and Hawking proved, there really is some kind of transcendence of the sequentiality of time and some kind of stasis, and that's what I've been working on getting my head around. Obviously, since memory increases with "forward" time, that's the entropic arrow and that's why we call it "forward"; but I call it the future pouring into the past and that's a bit of a backward description, properly reflecting the antitime effect that is going on. (Hawking calls this lightcone pour "pear-shaped", but I call it chocolate-chip-shaped.) No disrespect to any of three laws of thermodynamics of course, it's just a different frame of reference.
Naturally black hole mining is like interstellar travel or space elevators, something you need perhaps centuries to work on, which is why I'm doing it now and relying heavily on help from future me and others. At heart it's a simple application of Tipler.
So receptor fields and wormhole rides are, above, two different things. The first, time travel, absolutely requires consistency between source and target because you want both, departure and arrival, because time travel departure without arrival is exactly the subject of Asimov's story "Blank!". So you need long entanglement, in the same way the other article just described what they're calling "quantum teleportation" over phone lines but is really just spatial entanglement. Time travel is temporal entanglement, put simply. Now, since H. G. Wells pointed out that everyone knows how to time-travel "forwards" because they do it every day, the real game is what it means to time-travel "backwards", so let me focus on that one: target "precedes" source. Since we already "know" the past the target cannot be something contradictory to what we "know"; but remember that memory and anticipation are the same effect and have the same imperfections and limitations (with slightly different application due to sign change). If you want to be in the past (like when I traveled to Dealey Plaza for 1963-11-22, but I was a couple minutes off on my best try so didn't get the good stuff), it's not you that the past interacts with but the bits that represent you, and those bits are going to (1) be consistent with what we now know about the past and (2) be sufficient but not complete (because otherwise you'd have the Cassandra paradox instead of the unexpected egg). You can't send artifacts back like in Tenet, that would be antimatter and so would need shielding and be somewhat prohibitive; from your position in the present what you can do easily is to influence the formation of the artifacts that are already there, like in Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency. Receptors are necessarily Shannon information constructs, which include humans, angels, computers, DNA, crystals, etc. The information is transmitted by a resonance between source and target that has sufficient mathematical identity to be successful (mental note: separate the error-correction channel next time). The actual resonance appears primarily to exist in the M-theory dimensions in Calabi-Yau manifolds (I keep forgetting those guys), and then rather like RNA bases self-pairing the unique manifold representing a certain travel event pairs itself with a sufficiently similar manifold in the target time and the resonance and transfer is achieved. What did you want to use this for?
The second one, wormhole rides, is only about ordinary teleportation. Obviously Roddenberry never realized that the Enterprise would've already beamed up all the gold in Ft. Knox if the dilithium were working as advertised, so that would never work in most freewill universes. That's why it's not about the tech or the inanimate but about the living being that is transporting; only things like humans have the tech within them to be able to do transport because they are alive and thus connected to the opening of the additional dimensions via biotic process (you didn't think it was just about eating, excreting, and reproducing, did you?). Thus Neo's deja vu cat is better explained. Most modern science regards discussion of "spirit" as pseudoscience, but Futurama pointed out that if you say something that sounds more scientific like "lifeforce" they are fine with that instead even if it's just code for the same thing. So the scientific basis of "lifeforce" (spirit) is just that there must exist measurable phenomena in these additional dimensions that uncurl them beyond the Planck distance. If an Abbott Flatlander thinks he has only two dimensions, a Spherelander would tell him his body actually has a tiny extension or "depth" in a third dimension, and movement forward and backward in the third dimension is Flatland teleportation; and if the third dimension is warped via Calabi-Yau manifold then the teleport puts you in a different connected place (compare Dewdney's Planiverse). Again, think about what you want to use this for.
The best text on time travel is Revelation and the best text on space travel is Ezekiel; get to know those books closely and you'll see where the details come from. The time travellers have not permitted the general laws to be stated yet but there are great approximations and the central code is in those two books to start with.
Who are you man. You leave me in awe fairly often. You are a blessing in my life and I pray often that God will use/continue to use you for Greater and greater things. I have told you this before but I will say it again. You are a Beautiful mix of Brains and Heart. Much love brother. Keep shining that Light
One of the purported time travel experiments was a teenage boy who went back to talk to George Washington and another was of someone who went to listen to Abraham Lincoln speak as a candidate and was even in early photography of the event.
I've seen evidence myself that people can spiritually "slip" between the dimensions past present and future, both intentionally and involuntarily. And now there is talk about how scientists are discovering signs that things said today can change past-event outcomes. Tip of the reality iceberg.
I tried it, but I keep marrying the same girl!! 🤣🤪😂😎
Great time-travel joke, fren! Watch out that past me doesn't steal it and claim priority.
Nikola Tesla tried to tell his peers that he time traveled.
Tesla was Eastern Orthodox, so you're allowed to talk to him and he might even get back to you on it.
I'm allowed to reveal a few things about time travel but obviously all time travelers are agreed on the actual time when Massive Disclosure happens and (checks watch) it hasn't happened yet. Once it happens I'll be there to help guide.
Always beware claims that "I've been time traveling since X". What they mean is that some present, or future, event allowed them to time travel back to X and then they backdated their claim. For instance, if (when) the future me gave the 1971 me a book then I too could claim I've been time traveling since 1971 but it was actually the future me.
The guy you're quoting is obviously twisting things just a little to take the heat off the real time travelers, much like flat earthers take the heat off the real Antarctica research. You can't actually send a book back in time you can only send the contents. All you need is a reception frequency in the past that can see the book you're sending. The time travelers don't want you to know how easy those past receptor fields are to find as they are regular constructs of the activity of any human mind. We just don't think of them as such so we don't see the time travelers talking to us.
The part about a physical transporter is just all bogus, Star Trek meets The Prestige. It's not done with big tech constructions and portals, it's more like flying, you just catch an updraft called a wormhole and your body will hold itself together if you get a strong enough one. They're everywhere too. I have a little trouble doing it (kind of like hula hooping) but I know people who have done it.
u/Greekish is correct that time is a construct that can be dispensed with as an explanation. I'm still working on how Minkowski (who was smart enough to teach Einstein) differed from Euclid on how to insert time into the dimensions; that's my current avocational pursuit. That means there are two easy ways to construct time and they roughly correspond to the static forever and the experiential flow (the future potential pouring into the past actual as human anticipation becomes human memory). But there are other more exotic ways, and the Big Bang and black holes give hints; these are the ones that allow time travel. When I grow up I'm going to be a black hole miner. But first I must master that Minkowski spacetime.
Station identification: Remember, I larp as high-effort high-IQ. Let's continue having fun with it.
Yes, CTCs are wormholes, you just need to open up any of those M-theory dimensions beyond the Planck distance. The reason these paradoxes don't happen is that there's only one live universe we're dealing with (Novikov) and those paradoxes commit the common fallacy of mistaking the multiverse for true time travel. (If you want multiple timelines you need a multiverse and time travel will not help you; I have less experience with those.) Godel proved that he was always right except when he was wrong, that's incompleteness; so it's true that there are always incomplete aspects to time travel, but they don't affect the real practice at all just like infinity doesn't affect computing. In particular when you send the information back, the unexpected egg (apparent paradox) demonstrates that the recipients cannot know completely that it's legitimate and that's why it's sufficient to transmit substantially rather than perfectly. Cassandra in mythology knew "perfectly", which makes her a goddess rather than a human, but her listeners could not know perfectly (and so in that exaggeration they refused even substantial knowledge). Anyway, that also explains the evidence, namely it's so ubiquitous that it's been mistaken for other phenomena and ignored. The evidence for time travel is then something you can accumulate substantially but (as to any event) not perfectly until the event is completed and the loop closed; for instance, the (future) Official Disclosure event won't be believed if I gave you the correct date so it doesn't matter, but when it happens the past confirmations will all be there.
Anyway the wormhole mechanics for time travel are (as I said) about the bits not the atoms, which are processed via spacetime entanglement. The wormhole mechanics for teleportation are the atoms not the bits (unlike the imaginations given here), so they are a different story and they are processed via higher-dimensional transfer just like in Flatland.
"Euclidean" is a bit of a retronym for non-Lorentzian spacetime because you need a word for when time is additive instead of subtractive and so that's what I called it even though applying Euclid to time was a later development. Time follows all the Euclidean postulates anyway so it's natural to say. I don't say Minkowski is dispensable, rather he and Euclid (Newton) are two primary ways to view time and I don't have a good enumeration on all the major ways yet. For instance, the life review of an NDE is clearly a transtemporal event.
Black holes are not effective time travelers. (Yet.) They permit limited travel via Hawking radiation (I highly distrust the proposed alternative, exotic matter), which is basically the completely least efficient method of time travel; if you trace the antiparticle back in time you find it again at a much earlier instant outside the past event horizon. Black holes are important because they teach us about building white holes, which are the real winners. I suppose white holes could be effectively harnessed for time travel (hadn't thought about it) but they are mostly for zero-point energy tapping and may also allow more accurate multiverse access than otherwise. (Hartle found a theoretical Planck-sized closed universe attached to the Big Bang white hole via "quantum" tunneling, so that may be an example of how to connect the multiverse; it's still theory, and could be wrong, but is a great idea so far, better than say Tipler.)
What I claim to know about physics is that Einstein was right and "quantum" physics is bunk because its descriptions are deceptive even as its math is mostly right. It's deconstructionist; the cat is either alive or dead, never both (that would be multiverse again instead, not "quantum fluctuation"). I suppose I need a grant so I can work out the full math instead of keeping it at the conceptual level. (Also I've pointed out evidence of Magueijo lightspeed decay, which has the benefit of changing all kinds of math and bringing it into agreement with young-earth creationism.) But when I need to bring in those anomalies I try to be direct about them.
I had to look up Henri-Louis Bergson, yes, that's a philosophical description of xyz-t spacetime as opposed to xyz+t. But in xyz+t, in Planck units, Hartle and Hawking proved, there really is some kind of transcendence of the sequentiality of time and some kind of stasis, and that's what I've been working on getting my head around. Obviously, since memory increases with "forward" time, that's the entropic arrow and that's why we call it "forward"; but I call it the future pouring into the past and that's a bit of a backward description, properly reflecting the antitime effect that is going on. (Hawking calls this lightcone pour "pear-shaped", but I call it chocolate-chip-shaped.) No disrespect to any of three laws of thermodynamics of course, it's just a different frame of reference.
Naturally black hole mining is like interstellar travel or space elevators, something you need perhaps centuries to work on, which is why I'm doing it now and relying heavily on help from future me and others. At heart it's a simple application of Tipler.
So receptor fields and wormhole rides are, above, two different things. The first, time travel, absolutely requires consistency between source and target because you want both, departure and arrival, because time travel departure without arrival is exactly the subject of Asimov's story "Blank!". So you need long entanglement, in the same way the other article just described what they're calling "quantum teleportation" over phone lines but is really just spatial entanglement. Time travel is temporal entanglement, put simply. Now, since H. G. Wells pointed out that everyone knows how to time-travel "forwards" because they do it every day, the real game is what it means to time-travel "backwards", so let me focus on that one: target "precedes" source. Since we already "know" the past the target cannot be something contradictory to what we "know"; but remember that memory and anticipation are the same effect and have the same imperfections and limitations (with slightly different application due to sign change). If you want to be in the past (like when I traveled to Dealey Plaza for 1963-11-22, but I was a couple minutes off on my best try so didn't get the good stuff), it's not you that the past interacts with but the bits that represent you, and those bits are going to (1) be consistent with what we now know about the past and (2) be sufficient but not complete (because otherwise you'd have the Cassandra paradox instead of the unexpected egg). You can't send artifacts back like in Tenet, that would be antimatter and so would need shielding and be somewhat prohibitive; from your position in the present what you can do easily is to influence the formation of the artifacts that are already there, like in Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency. Receptors are necessarily Shannon information constructs, which include humans, angels, computers, DNA, crystals, etc. The information is transmitted by a resonance between source and target that has sufficient mathematical identity to be successful (mental note: separate the error-correction channel next time). The actual resonance appears primarily to exist in the M-theory dimensions in Calabi-Yau manifolds (I keep forgetting those guys), and then rather like RNA bases self-pairing the unique manifold representing a certain travel event pairs itself with a sufficiently similar manifold in the target time and the resonance and transfer is achieved. What did you want to use this for?
The second one, wormhole rides, is only about ordinary teleportation. Obviously Roddenberry never realized that the Enterprise would've already beamed up all the gold in Ft. Knox if the dilithium were working as advertised, so that would never work in most freewill universes. That's why it's not about the tech or the inanimate but about the living being that is transporting; only things like humans have the tech within them to be able to do transport because they are alive and thus connected to the opening of the additional dimensions via biotic process (you didn't think it was just about eating, excreting, and reproducing, did you?). Thus Neo's deja vu cat is better explained. Most modern science regards discussion of "spirit" as pseudoscience, but Futurama pointed out that if you say something that sounds more scientific like "lifeforce" they are fine with that instead even if it's just code for the same thing. So the scientific basis of "lifeforce" (spirit) is just that there must exist measurable phenomena in these additional dimensions that uncurl them beyond the Planck distance. If an Abbott Flatlander thinks he has only two dimensions, a Spherelander would tell him his body actually has a tiny extension or "depth" in a third dimension, and movement forward and backward in the third dimension is Flatland teleportation; and if the third dimension is warped via Calabi-Yau manifold then the teleport puts you in a different connected place (compare Dewdney's Planiverse). Again, think about what you want to use this for.
The best text on time travel is Revelation and the best text on space travel is Ezekiel; get to know those books closely and you'll see where the details come from. The time travellers have not permitted the general laws to be stated yet but there are great approximations and the central code is in those two books to start with.
Bruh 🤯🤯🤯
Who are you man. You leave me in awe fairly often. You are a blessing in my life and I pray often that God will use/continue to use you for Greater and greater things. I have told you this before but I will say it again. You are a Beautiful mix of Brains and Heart. Much love brother. Keep shining that Light
Is your first name "Professor"?
It ought to be, I profess enough.
Continued. Mirror.
Time is a construct of the human mind. There is no time phenomenon; only the continuous now. Allegedly.
One of the purported time travel experiments was a teenage boy who went back to talk to George Washington and another was of someone who went to listen to Abraham Lincoln speak as a candidate and was even in early photography of the event.
I've seen evidence myself that people can spiritually "slip" between the dimensions past present and future, both intentionally and involuntarily. And now there is talk about how scientists are discovering signs that things said today can change past-event outcomes. Tip of the reality iceberg.