Watch the trial closely. There's a lot of criticism being leveled against the judge right now because he's taking some initial steps that he's going to run a tough, but fair courtroom. They're actively seeding right-wing circles with FUD, asserting the judge is an activist, and alleging he's going to let the kid off. I feel like I'm watching pre-programming. For example, allowing the defendant to appear in civilian clothes (like a suit) is common practice, so are restrictions on the media circus outside the courtroom doors. But both are being cited as evidence the judge is "corrupt" and trying to influence the jury (by not presuming he's guilty from the outside??).

Anyway, watch the trial closely. The prosecution is going to have to make an airtight case. If they're creating a false cover story, there will be holes.

Also, watching the actions of the TPUSA exec is enlightening. Far too many were too quick to move on, too quick to step in without being asked. It's a power structure, and people were very eager to jump right into Charlie's place. That feels wrong too.

I hate this kind of palace intrigue, so I don't follow it too closely, but if you're curious about the truth, this is where you've got to look for clues to what that truth might be.