The leftie kongressvermin can go to hell, but this is just clickbait. First off, it doesn't bother to explain what "inappropriate" and "very naughty" mean. Such a vague and lurid description just leaves casual readers with the impression that he was getting off to photos of rheir most depraved imaginings.
Secondly, when this demonrat says "the photos were not pornographic," the images accompanyig the article back him up. None of them even show any nudity.
And third, is it now standard airline practice to look over passengers' shoulders to spy on what they're watching on their laptops?
We can do better than this, folks. I'm happy to see any demorats publicly embarrassed. But this "article" is nothing but sleazy clickbait, yellow journalism and cheap sensationalism, In fact, it's...inappropriate.
The leftie kongressvermin can go to hell, but this is just clickbait. First off, it doesn't bother to explain what "inappropriate" and "very naughty" mean. Such a vague and lurid description just leaves casual readers with the impression that he was getting off to photos of rheir most depraved imaginings.
Secondly, when this demonrat says "the photos were not pornographic," the images accompanyig the article back him up. None of them even show any nudity.
And third, is it now standard airline practice to look over passengers' shoulders to spy on what they're watching on their laptops?
We can do better than this, folks. I'm happy to see any demorats publicly embarrassed. But this "article" is nothing but sleazy clickbait, yellow journalism and cheap sensationalism, In fact, it's...inappropriate.