From the comments:
Q: What about girls rights?
A: What about them? Title 9 says people will not be discriminated against in the basis of sex. This is almost a non issue but here we are. Let the towns decide what they want for their communities.
No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.”
Me: “girls” sports inherently discriminates against every boy, so banning trans from girls sports actually makes sense
The trans argument is akin to having a tiger (identifying as a chicken) be allowed to fight in a cock fight. Who do you think wins? We aren't idiots and we have had enough of this nonsense.
they wanted “visibility” and they got it!
Why dont high school athletes have the right to play with middle schoolers?
I thought the DOJ was supposed fight this crap.
Conflicting state law, executive order, etc. have to sort it all out
Forcing mentally ill men into situations where women are endangered is mental abuse at least and can lead to physical abuse and sexual assault. It is wrong, wrong, wrong!
Iowa was the leader in rolling back trans “rights”
because its unworkable, untenable,
Have the trial and force 'them' to Prove that there is ONE 'trans' human in existence, because there is No such human. The Insane are many and these people are pure Insane. That does Not mean that the SANE must also pretend there is more than TWO genders.
we have to be careful using their language…
the word “gender” was originally used to describe languages that had masculine or feminine words,
Like Los Angels or Las Vegas
The LGBTQ+2S mob hijacked the word “gender”,
Repurposed “gender” to describe people instead.
We used to call it “sex” but even that is problematic because “sex” even has multiple meanings for example
the baby’s sex was male
the parents obviously had sex
So there are 2 “sexes” as in male and female,
Normally, that is…
There legit are hermaphodites, or a specimen born with the genitals of both a male and a female
Ive seen it up close and personal, on a puppy, and it was so unusual and rare that everyone stopped what they were doing to come and gawk…
But when they say “gender” they mean “how you present yourself” to the public.
They will say “gender is a social construct”
And they would be right…
But what does that mean?
It means basically that if a newborn baby is given a pink blanket, its assumed the baby is a girl, because of our culture assigning meaning to the color pink
Today, all babies are given WHITE blankets, with pink and blue stripes on both ends.
Its a low-key trans flag.
Trans flag is baby blue and baby pink
So this gender stuff begins at birth, and hospitals promote it with trans baby blankets
But as adults, we come to see some people as male, and some as female, based strictly on how they present themselves to us…
Do they dress like a woman?
Do they dress like a man?
Why do we even get dressed at all?
Why not walk around naked all day?
That would put a stop to gender madness!
Cant fake being a woman as easily
Cant fake being a man as easily either…
So by their own definitions of “gender”, as a “social construct”
You can easily collapase their entire narrative by extrapolating their logic:
If gender is a social construct
Then “trans gender” is also a social construct
Just because you put a pink blanket on a baby, won’t change the babies sex from male to female
THIS is the kind of sex ed students need in 2025