Everyone: Read her (candice) words carefully and try to prove her wrong regarding the shooting in 2022.
I think she is hinting it was a hoax, and you can see tim seems a bit reactionary / defensive.
One thing candice does do is choose her words carefully, she is no stranger to litigation.
AI insert:
“There is no evidence that anyone shot at Tim Pool in 2022. Instead, reports indicate that his brother fired warning shots at intruders on Pool's property that year to scare them off.”
She is baiting him a bit maybe. He’ll loose this round.
What surprises me about Tim Pool is that he is being touted as MAGA. When he first showed up,on my radar was on reddit TD in 2016ish. His shtick was as a liberal clutching his pearls at the corruption in the Dem party, ie., Hillary screwing Bernie. There was always someone posting about Pool. I assumed it was self promotion using sock puppet accounts. Was shocked he was even a player on that sub.
About that same time, I saw a couple of Candace’s videos here and there. She impressed me back then at her ability to debate unscripted with great answers. She seemed authentic. But I never watched any of her videos or podcasts that she put out until Charlie’s death. I lost track of her and wasn’t even aware she was part of TPUSA. AT Charlie’s death, I was barely familiar with him or TPUSA. I wasn’t even aware she was part of the Ben Shapiro bunch until I heard she was fired.
So this is all fresh to me. I have listened to all of Candace’s podcast since Charlie’s assassination. The constant attacks on her don’t seem to reflect what I hear from her. The critics cherry pick things she says and frame them out of context or paraphrase and falsely interpret what she says the same way Trump is. She seems like one of us to me.
That doesn’t mean I agree with her conclusions from the evidence she has collected. She is the only game in town if you want alternative info about Charlie’s death. Which in itself seems a little suspicious.
Sorry for so long. You just caught me at a decompress period.
Everyone: Read her (candice) words carefully and try to prove her wrong regarding the shooting in 2022.
I think she is hinting it was a hoax, and you can see tim seems a bit reactionary / defensive.
One thing candice does do is choose her words carefully, she is no stranger to litigation.
AI insert: “There is no evidence that anyone shot at Tim Pool in 2022. Instead, reports indicate that his brother fired warning shots at intruders on Pool's property that year to scare them off.”
She is baiting him a bit maybe. He’ll loose this round.
Look at pool’s words too. Candace didn’t say that Tim’s brother tried to shoot him.
I am biased though. I can’t stand TP. Candace is a train wreck I can’t quit watching. She’s awesome.
Exactly - she’s setting him up…..I think / exposing him as a liar.
I can't stand either one of them, they're really not credible IMO. Both seem to be in it for the money, and Candace is unhinged.
What surprises me about Tim Pool is that he is being touted as MAGA. When he first showed up,on my radar was on reddit TD in 2016ish. His shtick was as a liberal clutching his pearls at the corruption in the Dem party, ie., Hillary screwing Bernie. There was always someone posting about Pool. I assumed it was self promotion using sock puppet accounts. Was shocked he was even a player on that sub.
About that same time, I saw a couple of Candace’s videos here and there. She impressed me back then at her ability to debate unscripted with great answers. She seemed authentic. But I never watched any of her videos or podcasts that she put out until Charlie’s death. I lost track of her and wasn’t even aware she was part of TPUSA. AT Charlie’s death, I was barely familiar with him or TPUSA. I wasn’t even aware she was part of the Ben Shapiro bunch until I heard she was fired.
So this is all fresh to me. I have listened to all of Candace’s podcast since Charlie’s assassination. The constant attacks on her don’t seem to reflect what I hear from her. The critics cherry pick things she says and frame them out of context or paraphrase and falsely interpret what she says the same way Trump is. She seems like one of us to me.
That doesn’t mean I agree with her conclusions from the evidence she has collected. She is the only game in town if you want alternative info about Charlie’s death. Which in itself seems a little suspicious.
Sorry for so long. You just caught me at a decompress period.
Exactly. In the video she has referred to Jussie Smollett as analogy.
Nice!😀