First of all, of course I was sarcastically implying that what Colorado did was illegal. They broke so many laws and rules of judicial and prosecutorial conduct in order to railroad Tina that it's insane. Virtually every aspect of what went on for them to obtain that guilty verdict was illegal. What they did to delete all of the 2020 election data was illegal as well, and Tina legally maintained all of the proof of their guilt, that's why they chose her to railroad and use as a public example to scare everyone else who might come forward with proof of their crimes.
Secondly, you seem to be so hyper-focused on the fact that POTUS can't pardon people convicted of state crimes that you are completely ignoring the other things that people are posting here. Did you even bother to watch the interview above? Steve and Peter both talk repeatedly about the fact that it is standard protocol that prisoners from all 50 states are routinely transferred into federal custody every single day. If the state prisoner is going to be indicted for federal crimes as well, or is a witness to federal crimes and is needed by the federal government in order to prosecute those crimes in federal court, it is standard practice for the state to transfer the prisoner into federal custody. I have read in several places over the last few weeks that this is one of the main tactics the DoJ is planning, to use Tina Peters as a witness to the 2020 election fraud when they begin prosecuting those criminals in Colorado and all other 49 states who were involved in stealing the election.
And as far as POTUS being unable to pardon someone convicted under state laws when that person is also critical to federal prosecutions in some way, I am not sure that there is legal precedence on the issue, at least not from SCOTUS. I am not a lawfag, but in my personal opinion, I believe POTUS issued the presidential pardon not necessarily because he expected it to work in freeing Tina directly, but to lay the groundwork for an appeal to SCOTUS in order to test the legal aspects of this issue.
Why are the criminals running the Colorado government refusing to transfer Tina to federal custody under the Trump administration? I think everyone on these boards knows the answer to that question.
Then there are plenty of other valid, legal avenues to have her released. Why are you hyper focused on the one that has literally ZERO chances of having her released?
There's no reason to use a Presidential Pardon as some intro into pursuing other charges. All it does it muddy the water, make POTUS (along with those that support him in this) look ignorant about basic Presidential powers or appearing to just ignore our own laws, and then when nothing ever comes from it (because, legally nothing can come from it) people get angry and disillusioned and lose faith in the entire thing.
Think I'm wrong? Take a hard look around here at how few people are posting now. This isn't just a holiday slump in board interaction. You can go look at how many people were active here by looking through old posts, where it was common to get hundreds of responses on dozens of posts, each day. These days, we're lucky to get 100 responses on one or two posts a week.
And it's not just GAW. It's every Q board I'm on. You can go to any analytics site you want and order reports of how participation has changed over time.
I've constantly told people that you can't keep getting people's hopes up (by easy fixes like a Presidential pardon that has no legal standing), having people crash when reality meets up with their pipedreams, and then getting tired of having their emotions constantly fucked with over things that had ZERO chance of succeeding from DAY ONE without them just abandoning the entire thing.
This is a pattern that I see here CONSTANTLY, try to warn people away from spreading it and reading too much into it, watch when reality rudely intrudes on fantasies and then see the fallout, with the people responsible for baselessly getting everyone's hopes up in the first place just act like they had no idea that what they were telling people was nothing other than Bullshit. Like this isn't an elite research board and people aren't responsible for doing some basic, kindergarten level research before going balls deep into whatever nonsense they're peddling.
You're actively undermining the integrity of this board and Q when you peddle this type of copium based nonsense to people. It's irresponsible and actively killing this board and others like it.
That's why I spend my time fixing everyone reality sandwiches from time to time and try forcefeeding it to them.
First of all, of course I was sarcastically implying that what Colorado did was illegal. They broke so many laws and rules of judicial and prosecutorial conduct in order to railroad Tina that it's insane. Virtually every aspect of what went on for them to obtain that guilty verdict was illegal. What they did to delete all of the 2020 election data was illegal as well, and Tina legally maintained all of the proof of their guilt, that's why they chose her to railroad and use as a public example to scare everyone else who might come forward with proof of their crimes.
Secondly, you seem to be so hyper-focused on the fact that POTUS can't pardon people convicted of state crimes that you are completely ignoring the other things that people are posting here. Did you even bother to watch the interview above? Steve and Peter both talk repeatedly about the fact that it is standard protocol that prisoners from all 50 states are routinely transferred into federal custody every single day. If the state prisoner is going to be indicted for federal crimes as well, or is a witness to federal crimes and is needed by the federal government in order to prosecute those crimes in federal court, it is standard practice for the state to transfer the prisoner into federal custody. I have read in several places over the last few weeks that this is one of the main tactics the DoJ is planning, to use Tina Peters as a witness to the 2020 election fraud when they begin prosecuting those criminals in Colorado and all other 49 states who were involved in stealing the election.
And as far as POTUS being unable to pardon someone convicted under state laws when that person is also critical to federal prosecutions in some way, I am not sure that there is legal precedence on the issue, at least not from SCOTUS. I am not a lawfag, but in my personal opinion, I believe POTUS issued the presidential pardon not necessarily because he expected it to work in freeing Tina directly, but to lay the groundwork for an appeal to SCOTUS in order to test the legal aspects of this issue.
Why are the criminals running the Colorado government refusing to transfer Tina to federal custody under the Trump administration? I think everyone on these boards knows the answer to that question.
Then there are plenty of other valid, legal avenues to have her released. Why are you hyper focused on the one that has literally ZERO chances of having her released?
There's no reason to use a Presidential Pardon as some intro into pursuing other charges. All it does it muddy the water, make POTUS (along with those that support him in this) look ignorant about basic Presidential powers or appearing to just ignore our own laws, and then when nothing ever comes from it (because, legally nothing can come from it) people get angry and disillusioned and lose faith in the entire thing.
Think I'm wrong? Take a hard look around here at how few people are posting now. This isn't just a holiday slump in board interaction. You can go look at how many people were active here by looking through old posts, where it was common to get hundreds of responses on dozens of posts, each day. These days, we're lucky to get 100 responses on one or two posts a week.
And it's not just GAW. It's every Q board I'm on. You can go to any analytics site you want and order reports of how participation has changed over time.
I've constantly told people that you can't keep getting people's hopes up (by easy fixes like a Presidential pardon that has no legal standing), having people crash when reality meets up with their pipedreams, and then getting tired of having their emotions constantly fucked with over things that had ZERO chance of succeeding from DAY ONE without them just abandoning the entire thing.
This is a pattern that I see here CONSTANTLY, try to warn people away from spreading it and reading too much into it, watch when reality rudely intrudes on fantasies and then see the fallout, with the people responsible for baselessly getting everyone's hopes up in the first place just act like they had no idea that what they were telling people was nothing other than Bullshit. Like this isn't an elite research board and people aren't responsible for doing some basic, kindergarten level research before going balls deep into whatever nonsense they're peddling.
You're actively undermining the integrity of this board and Q when you peddle this type of copium based nonsense to people. It's irresponsible and actively killing this board and others like it.
That's why I spend my time fixing everyone reality sandwiches from time to time and try forcefeeding it to them.