3
en_folkefiende 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm not dooming. I'm asking hard questions, which - in some circles - is still welcome.

You answered w/ no evidence to support your claim. Go conjecture wherever you like. Who am I to tell you to go somewhere else? That wouldn't be neighborly of me.

4
en_folkefiende 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm not for giving away the store.

We're less than four months from the next election, and I didn't hear one actionable step toward making positive change for this November. Did you?

10
en_folkefiende 10 points ago +10 / -0

On explaining the problem, the speechwriters get an A. On explaining workable solutions for this November? Fill in the blank.

7
en_folkefiende 7 points ago +7 / -0

Meanwhile, over at NPR:

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

3
en_folkefiende 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nope. I'll instead tell you what Bannon said: that he had to schmooze and play Buddy-Buddy to get Epstein to cooperate. Very foreign to you and me, but just another day in the criminal underworld.

1
en_folkefiende 1 point ago +1 / -0

There IS a reason he's not in the White House. He's a non-conformist who's more effective in keeping MAGA alive and growing + harming its enemies from OUTSIDE the White House.

2
en_folkefiende 2 points ago +2 / -0

I hear you, that this is typically the case. But this case is somewhat different. MSNOW got the scoop a few days ago, and since then, the White House and Pres. Trump himself have stated that big news coming about election integrity.

And this morning, MSNOW was referring to a faction in the White House that agrees w/ their position, which may be true.

My hope? GEOTUS and his inner circle allowed it to be leaked to ensure maximum viewing. We'll see how it pans out.

2
en_folkefiende 2 points ago +2 / -0

Please take the 6m and 32s necessary to watch this. Then take 15 more minutes to view the show's opening for context. Bannon is asking all of the right questions.

https://rumble.com/v7cthb4-bannon-this-faction-within-the-white-house.html

4
en_folkefiende 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not exactly the headline you want when you’re eyeing the White House in 2028.

Were it 1998, this would be true. Here? In Modern Babylon 2026? This isn't opposition research. It's the Deep State doing what it always does: using what would otherwise be an October surprise to frame the narrative.

What narrative? That goodness and personal virtue have nothing to do w/ presidential politics. You watch. Newsom's personal failing will be turned and twisted to make him appear as a saint to his flock.

2
en_folkefiende 2 points ago +2 / -0

Know what's really weird?

What's really weird is that a) you can't provide solid examples, and b) he never suggested - seemingly or otherwise - that Trump isn't going to declare a national emergency as you say he did.

Weird, right?

view more: Next ›