Wow. Just wow.

Now, call me a skeptic, but at this moment, I fully believe that the reason this whole clip has not be promoted and made the rounds is because the fraudulent powers that be do NOT want to promote, in any way, the idea that citizens might actually be able to fight back in self defense using guns as weapons.

The old fella who shot back and was subsequently murdered is an absolute hero. I applaud his bravery, and he should be applauded no less than the initial tackler. Shameful that he is not.

Imo, no shame to the dude who put the gun down. if you watch him, he rests it against the tree then puts up his arm and waves in the air. Looks very much to me like he was saying, "It's OK. I'm not a shooter. Don't shoot me" - the idea being here that he was being really careful not to make himself a target of police, who it looks like he was aware of. Didn't want to be mistaken for one of the terrorists.

But the old fella, absolute lion. He took it back on them.

Some politicians would be saying, he should not have done that! He'd be alive today if he just kept out of it and let the police handle it. And they'd be 1000% wrong. His an old fella. His not thinking about his own life. He fought back like a lion. I got too much respect for him. (sorry. emotional thinking, but anyway....)

And what about the dude behind the tree with a gun at 1:52. Same. Fighting back with a rifle.

Our wannabe masters do NOT want the public to see real people actually fighting back, and with guns. It would undermine their whole eradication of public guns (guns for only the controlling authorities) narratives and agenda.

I'm pissed, frankly.

ps. Kudos on the hypothesis. I like the way you think. This is how we advance. Updoogle.