My comments were about what the post claimed, not solely what's said during the video itself. The only thing I mentioned that's specific to the actual video is its age.
I didn't realize I had to point that out explicitly. Apparently I overestimated everyone's ability to figure that out for themselves. Totally my bad.
I'm not sure where you're trying to go with your comment in regards to my pointing out that this is an elite research board. So rather than me trying to decode whatever it is you're trying to say there, maybe you could be so kind to clarify it a bit?
Yes, I get that everyone here aren't elite researchers. That's why I took the time to try to figure out why we're having so many of these "Breaking News!" posts of things months or even years old. Because obviously everyone isn't operating on the same level.
And then I gave clear, simple examples of how someone could be a better researcher. Such as doing a basic search with the "news" toggle on your favorite search engine. Or how to quickly find relevant YouTube videos. I just saved U/brain_dead untold hours of scrolling through hundreds and hundreds of posts here (thousands and thousands if we assume they do this for every single post they make), looking to see if the same "Breaking News!" had already been submitted or not (never mind that this doesn't check the validity of the content of the post and that it's still virtually useless because it's just checking the last few weeks, so it just means they're reposting stuff older than 3 weeks old).
And people seem to be really offended over that. So....🤷♀️.
My comments were about what the post claimed, not solely what's said during the video itself. The only thing I mentioned that's specific to the actual video is its age.
I didn't realize I had to point that out explicitly. Apparently I overestimated everyone's ability to figure that out for themselves. Totally my bad.
I'm not sure where you're trying to go with your comment in regards to my pointing out that this is an elite research board. So rather than me trying to decode whatever it is you're trying to say there, maybe you could be so kind to clarify it a bit?
Some Elite, but some just TRYING the best they know how....as the man said, YOU ARE THE NEWS, you also are the DECODER
Yes, I get that everyone here aren't elite researchers. That's why I took the time to try to figure out why we're having so many of these "Breaking News!" posts of things months or even years old. Because obviously everyone isn't operating on the same level.
And then I gave clear, simple examples of how someone could be a better researcher. Such as doing a basic search with the "news" toggle on your favorite search engine. Or how to quickly find relevant YouTube videos. I just saved U/brain_dead untold hours of scrolling through hundreds and hundreds of posts here (thousands and thousands if we assume they do this for every single post they make), looking to see if the same "Breaking News!" had already been submitted or not (never mind that this doesn't check the validity of the content of the post and that it's still virtually useless because it's just checking the last few weeks, so it just means they're reposting stuff older than 3 weeks old).
And people seem to be really offended over that. So....🤷♀️.