Quite a few Roman records exist mentioning Jesus. It is clear he existed. I can understand people questioning if he was the son of God. I believe he was.
The Archko Volume is a controversial 19th-century book, compiled by Rev. W.D. Mahan, claiming to be translations of ancient Jewish (Sanhedrin) and Roman records detailing Jesus' life, trial, crucifixion, and resurrection, including a purported official report from Pontius Pilate (Acta Pilata). While presenting itself as authentic ancient documents from Constantinople and the Vatican, scholars widely discredit it as fabricated or plagiarized, with Mahan himself convicted of falsehood, making it a debated text for biblical history enthusiasts rather than a historically accepted source.
Quite a few Roman records exist mentioning Jesus. It is clear he existed. I can understand people questioning if he was the son of God. I believe he was.
Oh really.
Yes, really. https://archive.org/details/archkovolumeorth028454mbp
See how easy it is to destroy your illusions?
The Archko Volume is a controversial 19th-century book, compiled by Rev. W.D. Mahan, claiming to be translations of ancient Jewish (Sanhedrin) and Roman records detailing Jesus' life, trial, crucifixion, and resurrection, including a purported official report from Pontius Pilate (Acta Pilata). While presenting itself as authentic ancient documents from Constantinople and the Vatican, scholars widely discredit it as fabricated or plagiarized, with Mahan himself convicted of falsehood, making it a debated text for biblical history enthusiasts rather than a historically accepted source.
Quite. Its a debated text, not one that is in scripture at all.