Vermont might argue with this, but otherwise, completely true!
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (19)
sorted by:
I know this is going to be wildly unpopular ,but I feel the need to point out that land area doesn't vote. People do. And the majority of the population of the US live in cities. 🤷♀️
Doesn't mean there are actually more liberals than conservatives in those cities, and obviously voter fraud is a real thing. I'm not arguing that it isn't.
I see people trying to argue with normies using this type of thing and it never goes over well and they end up shooting themselves in the foot with it.
It's just silly to use maps like this to try to convince people. Yeah, it's really impressive to see all that red on the map....but until dirt can vote, it's irrelevant.
Right. Our representatives need to be counted based on the amount of land owned by the voter. Problem solved. Land will be voting.
So liberal elites like:
Michael Bloomberg George Soros Bill Gates Melinda French Gates Dustin Moskovitz Cari Tuna Reid Hoffman Hansjörg Wyss Laurene Powell Jobs Pierre Omidyar
Can go out and buy billions of acres of land? And then you have all the people like the Obamas and Clintons and all of them in Congress and such who would do the same.
And that's just the liberals. Think of all the RINO billionaires who would do the same.
The country would just become a Plutocracy.
And then you have all the moderately wealthy liberals who would buy as much scrub land out in the middle of nowhere as they could.
So...I don't think I'll be supporting that idea. Sorry. 🤷♀️