artificial agents created under this program will learn best practices for online mediation by observing human experts and then employ these skills to interactively guide user groups to adhere to community guidelines
I defy you to read the above page and describe how DARPA could accomplish what it states its doing without using AI chat bots to infiltrate social media and forums.
To accomplish this, SMISC will focus research on linguistic cues, patterns of information flow and detection of sentiment or opinion in information generated and spread through social media. Researchers will also attempt to track ideas and concepts to analyze patterns and cultural narratives. If successful, they should be able to model emergent communities and analyze narratives and their participants, as well as characterize generation of automated content, such as by bots, in social media and crowd sourcing.
SMISC was launched in 2011, over 15 years ago. Ya think they might have gotten any better at it since then?
Do you have any extraordinary proof for this?
Let's see. Now that you've been proven wrong, what do you do?
I referred to claims about specific people being "bots"
Goalpost shift. Goalpost shift again. And again.
Did I name any specific people? No.
I said AI bots are common.
Your zeal in defending the rights of people you specifically wrote a thread to admonish is remarkable.
How is it you care so much about scolding the blackpill crowd who are crying nothing is happening, so much so that you authored an entire thread about it, but are offended at maximum level that anyone would suggest a blackpiller is a bot.
Incredibly weird.
Right here, right now, you could go to chatgpt and ask it to instruct you in making an AI bot. You can have the bot represent a viewpoint. You can give it a set of exact instructions in documents of hundreds of megs in size. You can set it lose and watch it respond to people with the point of view you gave it. It's nearly trivial for civilians to do this for free, and the cabal has trillions at their disposal.
Then name the "goalpost" I supposedly "set". Then name the alleged "changes".
Did I name any specific people? No.
Didn't say you did.
Your zeal in defending the rights
Rights such as?
of people you specifically wrote a thread to admonish is remarkable.
Because I care about ideas. Using the "ur a bot" card is ALWAYS universally bad, no matter which side uses it.
so much so that you authored an entire thread about it,
People make threads all the time.
but are offended at maximum level that anyone would suggest a blackpiller is a bot.
Because we should be fair and not accuse others of being something we cannot verify. You do know people with wrong beliefs will increasingly automatically and arbitrarily reject what we say as "muh bots" too right? Take the high road. If the person real then cool. If it is a "bot" then make it so normies can see how your true belief destroyed the "bot"'s claims.
Thankfully neither of us are accusing each other of being one so lets keep it that way.
Right here, right now, you could go to chatgpt and ask it to instruct you in making an AI bot.
The code would likely be buggy as GPT has a history of being awful at coding.
You can have the bot represent a viewpoint.
Absolutely any one. Regardless of whether you agree with the viewpoint or not. Also viewpoints should be judged based on TRUTH VALUE, not where it came from, the latter is Genetic Fallacy. Coming from a bot alone is a trash way to evaluate evidence.
It's nearly trivial for civilians to do this for free, and the cabal has trillions at their disposal.
I hope Trump disbands and shuts down many data centers. If Trump wants to fight the deep state he should wreck their weapon that is AI.
https://www.darpa.mil/research/programs/civil-sanctuary
I defy you to read the above page and describe how DARPA could accomplish what it states its doing without using AI chat bots to infiltrate social media and forums.
https://www.darpa.mil/research/programs/social-media-in-strategic-communication
SMISC was launched in 2011, over 15 years ago. Ya think they might have gotten any better at it since then?
Let's see. Now that you've been proven wrong, what do you do?
I referred to claims about specific people being "bots". I wasn't saying anything about Darpa's capabilities nor claiming that bots don't exist.
Goalpost shift. Goalpost shift again. And again.
Did I name any specific people? No.
I said AI bots are common.
Your zeal in defending the rights of people you specifically wrote a thread to admonish is remarkable.
How is it you care so much about scolding the blackpill crowd who are crying nothing is happening, so much so that you authored an entire thread about it, but are offended at maximum level that anyone would suggest a blackpiller is a bot.
Incredibly weird.
Right here, right now, you could go to chatgpt and ask it to instruct you in making an AI bot. You can have the bot represent a viewpoint. You can give it a set of exact instructions in documents of hundreds of megs in size. You can set it lose and watch it respond to people with the point of view you gave it. It's nearly trivial for civilians to do this for free, and the cabal has trillions at their disposal.
Then name the "goalpost" I supposedly "set". Then name the alleged "changes".
Didn't say you did.
Rights such as?
Because I care about ideas. Using the "ur a bot" card is ALWAYS universally bad, no matter which side uses it.
People make threads all the time.
Because we should be fair and not accuse others of being something we cannot verify. You do know people with wrong beliefs will increasingly automatically and arbitrarily reject what we say as "muh bots" too right? Take the high road. If the person real then cool. If it is a "bot" then make it so normies can see how your true belief destroyed the "bot"'s claims.
Thankfully neither of us are accusing each other of being one so lets keep it that way.
The code would likely be buggy as GPT has a history of being awful at coding.
Absolutely any one. Regardless of whether you agree with the viewpoint or not. Also viewpoints should be judged based on TRUTH VALUE, not where it came from, the latter is Genetic Fallacy. Coming from a bot alone is a trash way to evaluate evidence.
I hope Trump disbands and shuts down many data centers. If Trump wants to fight the deep state he should wreck their weapon that is AI.