So, I have been watching a certain kind of news article for many, many years. The news article has a very formulaic template of
“LARGE NUMBER OF PEDOS ARRESTED, LARGE NUMBER OF CHILDREN RESCUED”
idk why these stories caught my attention. maybe it was their compulsive need to “hedge” facts
for example, they might say AT LEAST 152 pedos arrested, and AT LEAST 63 children rescued
what you mean “at least”?
if there was MORE than 152 or 63, then maybe just give us that exact number, instead of implying theres some sort of ambigiuty on basic facts
I was also “concerned” that the authorities seem to sit on these cases for many years, before taking any action, which means to me that “at least” 63 children were being abused daily while the authorites are sipping coffee…
I spent many hours chasing these stories, trying to find any actual evidence that anyone was arrested, or that anyone was rescued
At first, i could NEVER find any supporting evidence, such as the suspects names, mugshots, court dates, convictions, etc
After many posts and comments like the one you are reading now, things started to change….
Now we get a whole page of names and mugshots, but the faces feel like AI, and so do the names.
When you try to follow-up on these names, theres almost nothing out there. No local news etc
So, just recently i had the bright idea to use ChatGPT to make a master list of all these supposed operations, and how they were resolved
ChatGPT would cite a government claim, like a DOJ press release, as actual evidence
When i pressed harder, ChatGPT conceeded there was no real evidence outside of vague claims made by the government
ChatGPT also mentioned how a lot of times, these long running “fed” operations were actually just a summary of what local law enforcement had been doing over the last X years
Local cops bust a local pimp, the feds take credit, and lump the local bust in with
“operation look busy because the boss is coming”
i also asked chatGPT to produce any evidence that any of these supposedly rescue children actually exist.
ChatGPT gave me all kinds of reasons why they couldn’t give me any evidence and none of them were very convincing at all
Out of the thousands of children supposedly rescued, none of them have made a social media page or started a foundation or organization or whatever to publicize what happened to them and to publicize the problems and maybe try to do something about it
Mark my word: because I will be referencing this post in the near future…
After this post goes out, a person will emerge and claim that they were a victim of child sex trafficking, and that they were rescued during one of these operations. However, if we dig deeper on this person, we will find out they are nothing more than a crisis actor, feeding us another scripted line of bullshit.
My challenge to anyone reading this:
Make a mental note to yourself, that next time you hear a big story about a bunch of pedophiles being arrested in children being rescued, you’re gonna check it out a little deeper
You’re gonna find out if any of those people were from your hometown
You’re gonna find out if any of those people were from your home state
You’re gonna find out if any of these people have mug shots or their names
You’re gonna find out if there’s any court dates
And you’re gonna find out if there’s any convictions
And I think what you will find very quickly, is that these stories are very long on big claims, and very short on hard evidence
except the pattern goes back decades.
interesting how the FBI has jurisdiction in kidnapping cases, but they always seem to fuck it up and lose the evidence
Seems like the FBI’s job is to gather all the evidence and make sure it’s never seen again
They take over any local investigation, not to further justice, but to obstruct justice
It's definitely a low coverage subject in the media. A good example of how the media fails the public.
There must be powerful incentives in the media and law enforcement to keep a lid on this. At least the public is becoming more aware of human trafficking in recent years. It's a start.
I read this Fox News article a few weeks ago, and it occurred to me that this article isn't what it seems to be. The illuminati number 33 in the article made me take a closer look at it. Also, the fact that is a cruise ship in the Caribbean is something that anons know about so that, too, was a clue. On the surface, the article is about an obese man drinking 33 drinks and then dying. Imo, this article is really a comm about a trafficking op.
Scroll down to the two paragraphs just under the diagram of the ship and substitute the words alcohol and beverage with boy or girl. "Deluxe Beverage Package" can take on a new meaning.
If I'm right, pedophiles are getting arrested, and this article is a coded warning to them.
Imagine the panic and disruption that would occur if it was all publicly exposed. It's everywhere right under our noses, I think.
As far as what happens to the young women and children who are saved, I wish I knew.
Forgot to link the article.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/family-sues-royal-caribbean-after-man-allegedly-served-33-drinks-dies-aboard-cruise-ship