They do seek to incriminate you, but the capitalized name is not the nexus of the scheme and is a distraction that allows them to scoop up people who argue it. The nexus is that income tax is in the nature of an excise, and excises do not apply to rights, which include the right to exchange labor for pay. Therefore it is necessary to reject suggestions that earnings were subject to excise if legally they were not. The details are easy to follow for those interested in asking questions.
Yes, the exchange for my labor is not income, its my property. The legal versus lawful argument is kind of where I was going. Interesting comment nonethel3ss. Thank you
They do seek to incriminate you, but the capitalized name is not the nexus of the scheme and is a distraction that allows them to scoop up people who argue it. The nexus is that income tax is in the nature of an excise, and excises do not apply to rights, which include the right to exchange labor for pay. Therefore it is necessary to reject suggestions that earnings were subject to excise if legally they were not. The details are easy to follow for those interested in asking questions.
Yes, the exchange for my labor is not income, its my property. The legal versus lawful argument is kind of where I was going. Interesting comment nonethel3ss. Thank you