Peymon explains it pretty clearly here in 26 minutes...answers all the "deep" questions, arising from fearful programming.....which is what prevents 95% of people from taking back their power and benefiting from their own hard-earned money.
In short, you only need to pay "income taxes" if you live in the geographical boundaries of the District of Columbia and/or are employed by the Federal government. That's the "law" (rules written by the rule-makers) and what the Founding Fathers originally intended, and has always been true to this very day.
As I predicted, here are a couple snippets demonstrating that he doesn't explain it but merely asserts a theory and hopes it works, which is what so many others are doing.
Misleading: The IRS has the power to put people in prison who have not confessed under oath, and they often have; it just takes longer (which benefits the paytriots who sell packages now and don't help later).
False. Ordinary people of the 50 states are required to pay taxes on taxable income whether they self-assess or whether the IRS assesses (which takes longer). There are many other nexuses of federal involvement than merely connection to DC or being a federal employee.
False. If you owe tax, a petition (e.g. for redress) doesn't exempt you from owing or paying the tax, nor pause any clocks. If it's true that you don't owe tax (or owe a different amount than another has assessed), a petition is unnecessary because you simply testify everything necessary to demonstrate ministerially what you owe.
False, though he's equivocating by adding the word "federal". Obviously the people don't have to pay "federal employment tax" unless they have federal employment. But the "employment tax" and other "income taxes" do not relate to employment with the federal government; they relate to employment and related nexuses as defined by the statutes and code, which can apply anywhere in the world.
False, the W-2, 1099, and K-1 apply to payors of various payments defined by the law and apply in the 50 states and anywhere in the world.
The way to compare his assertions and my own is to look at the statutes and code as a whole to determine the reality. A person not willing to do that with a little guidance should not rely on a 20-minute video and a 150-page petition packet as if petitioning relieves one of a legal duty.
(Those who desire to engage peaceful civil disobedience and are willing to suffer for it are excepted. But one cannot pretend one is complying with some law in this respect without knowing the law.)