This is the very first post I made on GAW almost 2 years ago. Given today's cell phone outages, the following can again shed light on WHY I believe these outages are occurring.
I work as a telecom engineer troubleshooting/programming the Ciena 5164 optical router used for Verizon and At&t. These companies and many of my colleagues know exactly what it was but the more interesting part that raised some eyebrows was the fact that cc payment processing and emergency services/SOS/911 calls WERE possible for most of the affected customers. This is key. (This all runs on the same fiber optic network and should have been ‘down’ also.)
NOTE: If your phone signal meter says SOS, you CAN call 911.
I cannot overstate how anomalous the above fact pattern is because when our networks go down, they don’t go down in this piecemeal way.
Here’s the takeaway:
The goal of a ‘cyber weapon’ is maximum disruption.
But (IMO) this in NOT a weapon but a cyber tool.
Whoever deployed (tested) this ‘cyber tool’ went to great lengths to pause specific categories of communication ONLY.
This surgeon scalpel approach we saw was a MUCH more difficult task than to just ‘nuke’ the whole system so to speak. A tool like this would need to be tested a few times to ensure a reliable partitioning of the ‘Target’ [calls/data] and the ‘Not Target’ [911/cc processing].
All of these phone/data/911 services run on the exact same network. There is no secret back up or auxiliary.
The network is quasi redundant but the very nature of how it's laid out (to a degree) because if one node goes down, data can be routed around that node, etc.
To be clear:
When new, normal configs are put into an optical router and everything seems to be done properly, a period of several minutes to a few hours may be necessary to make sure the node is operating properly.
The point I'm trying to drive home here is at these systems can be EXTREMELY FINICKY when you make changes.
There are hundreds of thousands of 12+ year old fiber optic routers running right now in the USA handling a mind-boggling amount of cellular data/traffic that.
IF one where to be brought off-line for just a few minutes by a tech and then we tried to bring the router back up and put cellular/data traffic on that router again, it's not unusual for it too require 30+ minutes or more of troubleshooting bs to get the router to come back up and do what it had just been doing, uninterrupted, for the last decade until just a few mins prior.
That's the specific nature of the fickleness of these machines.
IF it works fine for a day, it should work flawlessly for a decade… BUT a hypothetical cyber tool such as this MUST be tested before you can know for sure that the network is going to behave as (WH) intend it to.
BUT WHY?
Enemy sleeper cells need reliable Comms for max effectiveness.
Q2056: "It must be hard to communicate."
u/#q2056
WWG1WGA!
I worked as subcontractor for Fujitsu from 97 to 2002 upgrading multiplex software in colocations / nodes / etc.. 9/11 pretty much ended that job..
Since joining this community I have been interested in these outages and how they are being presented,,, VERY STRANGE..
I’m definitely not a telecom engineer, hell, I don’t even consider myself a techie, but I can say from what I learned while being in the industry, these outages make ZERO SENSE, as they’re being presented.
I haven’t looked into this in a while, but when I did it seemed apparent that these outages were inside jobs that seemed to have been cleared to happen and not from an outside attack or from failed equipment / software / what have you. Things definitely have changed since I worked in telecom, but I can’t imagine they’ve changed to such a degree where outages happen in the manner they are being presented here.
*This Has White Hats Written ALL OVER IT!
**The question we should be asking is “why are WHs doing this”? Is it to bring something new online? Is it to run takedown ops?? Are they testing something new??? Or,,,,, is it just a ploy to raise eyebrows, add weirdness to an already VERY WEIRD ENVIRONMENT????🤷♂️
Also, I’m interested if anyone here has any thoughts on Verizon having been quietly punished by a court decision for past fuckery?
My Verizon coverage went to shit and I looked into why this happened. From what I gathered Verizon, at some point, skipped buying spectrum at a point in time when that seemed to make zero sense. Due to this they lost some of their coverage advantage and I speculate that this “could” have been the result of a court decision / punishment .?. Does anyone here know anything about this???