Midterms will be MAGA clean sweep. RINOs will be gone. Where do you think thje disclosure phase is headed? and why do you think its timed this way?

Military is the only way = devolution.

If we bring in military now, Half the population will never believe anything they are shown and we have lost everything.

I think we have a very good chance in the midterms, but something Trump said at Davos yesterday -- about the 2020 election being rigged, he had the proof, and that something will be done about it soon -- suggests to me that by the midterms, our elections in America will become fair and truthful again. That means doom for the Demwit Party.

WE have been TOLD over and over that not just 2020 was stolen BUT all elections in 72 countries are ILLEGITIMATE! Which means the politicians , in 72 Countries have no legal jurisdiction. ONCE ALL the info comes out as Trump keeps promising, I tend to agree with JF Anon that Trump will be the first to step down until the Election system is rectified. MILITARY is the ONLY way WW.

Then there's no reason not to do it now then.

We've known from the beginning that the only way is the military, so there's not one logical reason why they shouldn't just announce it and take over.

otherwise they are just wasting everyone's time.

I keep thinking about this and wondering why we have to wait on the military until then.

I am skeptical of the Military being the only way. History actually proves that only to e true for ushering in tyranny, not stopping it.

Our founders understood this, and warned about the dangers of having a large standing military force. The military was never designed for domestic duties, that is the province of the Militia's we are supposed to have within each of our communities.

We should trust our liberation to our own hands, with support from our neighbors, families, friends, and other nearby communities.

“What, Sir, is the use of a militia? It is to prevent the establishment of a standing army, the bane of liberty. ...Whenever Governments mean to invade the rights and liberties of the people, they always attempt to destroy the militia, in order to raise an army upon their ruins.” ~ Elbridge Gerry (1744-1814) of Massachusetts, Signer of the Declaration of Independence and Member of the Constitutional Convention spoken during floor debate over the Second Amendment, I Annals of Congress at 750, August 17, 1789

“But if circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude, that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people, while there is a large body of citizens, little if at all inferior to them in discipline and use of arms, who stand ready to defend their rights” ~ Alexander Hamilton (1757-1804) American statesman, Secretary of the Treasury Federalist, No. 29

“A standing army, however necessary it may be at some times, is always dangerous to the liberties of the people. Such power should be watched with a jealous eye.” ~ Samuel Adams (1722-1803), was known as the "Father of the American Revolution."

“The highest number to which a standing army can be carried in any country does not exceed one hundredth part of the souls, or one twenty-fifth part of the number able to bear arms. This portion would not yield, in the United States, an army of more than twenty-five or thirty thousand men. To these would be opposed a militia amounting to near half a million citizens with arms in their hands, officered by men chosen from among themselves, fighting for their common liberties and united and conducted by governments possessing their affections and confidence. It may well be doubted whether a militia thus circumstanced could ever be conquered by such a proportion of regular troops. ... Besides the advantage of being armed, ... the existence of subordinate governments ... forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of. ... [The governments of Europe] are afraid to trust the people with arms. ... Let us not insult the free and gallant citizens of America with the suspicion that they would be less able to defend the rights of which they would be in actual possession than the debased subjects of arbitrary power would be to rescue theirs from the hands of their oppressors.” ~ James Madison (1751-1836), Father of the Constitution for the USA, 4th US President The Federalist Papers, No. 46

IMO, stay the course. It does not matter who wins the midterms at this point as it's a uni-party election. Anticipate the application of martial law in many areas, mostly Blue, some Purple and maybe some Red. The word "abolish" is in the Declaration and that is what is needed as the old system is unmanageable and too easily corruptible. The 250th anniversary may be a new founding. Protect you and yours and God Bless America.

Military is the only way....I thought meant if an insurrection is caused, the military can come in. TAKE OVER AND OVERSEE OUR ELECTION.

Just like Jimmy Carter did everywhere, but not here. Iraq had purple fingers, and hand counted paper ballots. We can too. This is why the precinct level was created, small enough to count, enough people to help, and most know each other. If we did this several times a year for national, state and municipal elections, it would also foster candidates the voters know and trust. Instead of picking the 'shiny card' in the mail.

So for a real election when the process is still broken, the military is the only way. Thoughts????

Most of the heavy lifting by the military has been done. Still some key things, but the optics will be good.

Whatever the meaning or purpose of this post. It doesn’t mean that we do NOT fight to WIN! Just don’t be hung up on how we WIN.