"[clipping: Unlike drugs, a child's body can be sold over and over]
This is not surprising but there is no such thing as a child prostitute!
They are children and cannot consent!
They are missing the biggest in my own backyard and so many more!
Like Maralago and where I see Mr. Joe and Mrs. Anne.
Please release me from this torture and hell!"
What conclusion did you draw from these insane ramblings?
I can't even make out what she is saying or how Mar a Lago fits in. But even if we stupidly jump to the conclusion that the mere mention of Mar a Lago means Trump went to the island, how do you know this witness is credible?
Are you just blindly assuming Black and Mitchell are guilty? And then assuming again that she would not lie about a third person?
If that's the case then I'm afraid your capacity for reason is beneath acceptable limits for this board.
"[clipping: Unlike drugs, a child's body can be sold over and over] This is not surprising but there is no such thing as a child prostitute! They are children and cannot consent! They are missing the biggest in my own backyard and so many more! Like Maralago and where I see Mr. Joe and Mrs. Anne. Please release me from this torture and hell!"
What conclusion did you draw from these insane ramblings?
That's where you go with it, really??
I can't even make out what she is saying or how Mar a Lago fits in. But even if we stupidly jump to the conclusion that the mere mention of Mar a Lago means Trump went to the island, how do you know this witness is credible?
Are you just blindly assuming Black and Mitchell are guilty? And then assuming again that she would not lie about a third person?
If that's the case then I'm afraid your capacity for reason is beneath acceptable limits for this board.
Ah I see, the selective "believe all women" approach combined with a "sincere" concern.
Everyone here is familiar.