That's a great ruling, I've read a ton about it and it has nothing to do with the 2020 election. Go back and read what I wrote. Of the few that were tossed for no standing, only three were candidates, and two of those were tossed by Trump appointed judges.
This doesn't change anything I wrote, it's a completely different scenario, no matter what podcasters and twitter folk tell you.
Real question, did you read the scotusblog post you sent me?
That's a great ruling, I've read a ton about it and it has nothing to do with the 2020 election. Go back and read what I wrote. Of the few that were tossed for no standing, only three were candidates, and two of those were tossed by Trump appointed judges.
This doesn't change anything I wrote, it's a completely different scenario, no matter what podcasters and twitter folk tell you.
Real question, did you read the scotusblog post you sent me?
What an absurd statement.
Lay it out smart guy
The SC ruling directly pertains to the reason Trump's election fraud cases in 2020-2021 were dismissed.
Quote that section.