In the picture I am not seeing where it says she is pushing for digital ID.
As far as social media goes... I cannot disagree with the statement that our culture is decaying because of it. Do I trust parents to stop it? Of course not. How do you propose we avoid the total annihilation of the younger generations via social media if not by what she is proposing?
Mind you, I am not pro-government. I am what I call a prudent governmentalist, which basically means use government sparaingly and when there are no other ways.
Yeah I'm not sure why we would get all worked up about this. No kids on social media, and I really do like the part about algorithms can't manipulate them. Should be 18 though for that part.
lol, you are making an assumption that there is no way to do ID check while protecting privacy and so you would rather let kids keep getting groomed on social media. I guess "save the kids" is just a catch phrase for some people.
Its quite amazing how we recided "Fear is the mindkiller" during all of the Plandemic, and yet seem to have comepletely forgotten now. Honestly, with this level of psyops I am amazed that we even have a chance.
In the picture I am not seeing where it says she is pushing for digital ID.
As far as social media goes... I cannot disagree with the statement that our culture is decaying because of it. Do I trust parents to stop it? Of course not. How do you propose we avoid the total annihilation of the younger generations via social media if not by what she is proposing?
Mind you, I am not pro-government. I am what I call a prudent governmentalist, which basically means use government sparaingly and when there are no other ways.
Yeah I'm not sure why we would get all worked up about this. No kids on social media, and I really do like the part about algorithms can't manipulate them. Should be 18 though for that part.
It does have the element of a potential slippery slope. But there are ways to prevent that.
Yeah the way to prevent it is to block this bill and primary Anna Paulina Luna, along with every other clown that pushes this bullshit stuff.
Europe and Aus are already slipping the fucking noose as we speak. Pay attention.
Aren't you so glad the Republicans won and saved us from Digital ID?"
Fuck these deep state trash Republicans. Luna is compromised.
Leave our kids alone, we’ll protect them from the internet, “ NOT YOU “ “government” you can’t even keep from pissing our stolen tax dollars away
I have a really hard time getting myself worked up over this
Oh hello there mister frog in the slowly boiling water.
lol, you are making an assumption that there is no way to do ID check while protecting privacy and so you would rather let kids keep getting groomed on social media. I guess "save the kids" is just a catch phrase for some people.
🧨🎯Well spoken, but unfortunately wasted on deaf ears. Fear is a powerful motivater, isn't it?
Its quite amazing how we recided "Fear is the mindkiller" during all of the Plandemic, and yet seem to have comepletely forgotten now. Honestly, with this level of psyops I am amazed that we even have a chance.
I see nothing wrong with this legislation, it's common sense to protect kids. 17+? Still a kid.
Sorry, she supports "back door" what?
Color me confused.
Dude you literally post on a conspiracy forum and you don't realize how this is bad?
I'm disappointed. You need to be more paranoid.
On the contrary...
I read the bill. It says kids under 13 can’t use social media, and teens under 17 can’t be fed algorithm-driven content. That’s it.
There’s nothing in it about digital ID, mass surveillance, or backdoor tracking. If you think there is, point to the exact part where it says that.
Calling this ‘tyranny’ without evidence isn’t being careful—it’s just reacting. Being paranoid only helps if you’re also accurate.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/7399
Oh my god you are so painfully naive. I can't stand it.
I’m sorry for your loss. But...
Naive would be trusting claims without reading the bill. I did the opposite.
If there’s something specific in the text I missed, point it out.
If not, we’re just talking past the issue and deflecting from the actual point.