i want to agree with you, BUT…

who is this woman, and why does she seem to be speaking from memory rather than from a script?

while i find her to be somewhat credible, in spite of not liking the implications of what she is saying,

i also can’t figure out how “Norm Lubow” got involved in this story.

seems to me that if she had a legitimate case, she would have found a legitimate lawyer?

unless…

this psyop smear job was meant as a warning shot across the bow.

they couldn’t find any real lawyer dumb enough to get involved,

so they had this character do it instead,

then they can tease the story when they want to, but also back out of it if Epstein ops got too much exposure

im still working on this, and im open to changing my mind

yesterday i assumed “katie johnson” didn’t even exist

today id like to know more about this mysterious woman, who was talking about Epstein sex parties.

where did she get this knowledge?

is she speaking from first hand personal experience?

or is she reciting a script

and if she is reciting a script, then who wrote the script…

The story is strange for two different ways

they went to the trouble of filing the case, and all of the network of people that made this story into what it is today

then they have this alleged victim who sounds credible-enough

if shes credible, why aren’t libs pushing her story?

if she’s not credible, why aren’t cons exposing her bullshit?

this story seems to me to be a BOMBSHELL

and yet everyone is ignoring this elephant in the room