If they were actually more concerned about the children than protecting their as-ses from defamation suits, they'd disclose them in public rather than saying they "have to do it in Congress" (where they're protected by the Speech and Debate clause, which means if a Member of Congress publicly names individuals:
•They cannot be sued for defamation
•They cannot be legally questioned elsewhere
•They face no legal consequences for what is said, even if the information is:
•Unverified
•Misleading
•Incomplete or
•Wrong).
Alledgedly a sultan (from Oman?)
If they were actually more concerned about the children than protecting their as-ses from defamation suits, they'd disclose them in public rather than saying they "have to do it in Congress" (where they're protected by the Speech and Debate clause, which means if a Member of Congress publicly names individuals: •They cannot be sued for defamation •They cannot be legally questioned elsewhere •They face no legal consequences for what is said, even if the information is: •Unverified •Misleading •Incomplete or •Wrong).
Massie = self-serving POS
Ammo - with clips of him and his posts - revealing Massie and his M.O./agenda/bs, starts ~1h46m50s - https://rumble.com/v75jv52-guthrie-kidnapping-massie-vs-trump-obama-monkeys-vs-2020-fruad-epstein-unre.html