I pointed out Erica Kirk isn't wearing her ring anymore. From that one sentence assertion you assumed my position and asserted I was ignoring things.... From a simple 100% true assertion that had nothing to do with anything else you or anyone else said.
It was a completely illogical response to the simple addition of a clear fact.
You perceived it as an attack and you got defensive with a disproportional response.
Then you attempt to gaslight me and say that I was being defensive? đ You're projecting.
Before you start throwing terms like "logic" around incorrectly, go down to your local community college and take a class on it. Because your reply is displaying fallacious reasoning, intellectual dishonesty through misrepresentation, and logical fallacies.
The only question at this point is if you're the type of reddit style mod that will ban me because I'm disagreeing with you.
There is a bit of advice I fell compelled to pass on. It comes from someone very adept at psychological warfare. IMHO it should be every anon's mantra:
Protect your mind - control your emotions
If we do that, and focus on our support for President Trump rather than argue about side issues, then we will be doing our part.
Yeah that's great advice. Let me give you a piece of advice from world famous theologian and one of the greatest debaters of all time, Dr James White....
"Never misrepresent people or their positions during a debate or discussion."
Being said where have I displayed any emotions? Did I say I was mad? No. Did I say I was sad? No. Did I say I was angry? No. Did I say I was in love? No.
Trying to dismiss my assertions and counterpoints as emotions is an intellectually dishonest misrepresentation. Discuss and debate based on what is said, not what you would like to perceive in order to strengthen your position.
You're intellectually dishonest.
I pointed out Erica Kirk isn't wearing her ring anymore. From that one sentence assertion you assumed my position and asserted I was ignoring things.... From a simple 100% true assertion that had nothing to do with anything else you or anyone else said.
It was a completely illogical response to the simple addition of a clear fact.
You perceived it as an attack and you got defensive with a disproportional response.
Then you attempt to gaslight me and say that I was being defensive? đ You're projecting.
Before you start throwing terms like "logic" around incorrectly, go down to your local community college and take a class on it. Because your reply is displaying fallacious reasoning, intellectual dishonesty through misrepresentation, and logical fallacies.
The only question at this point is if you're the type of reddit style mod that will ban me because I'm disagreeing with you.
I guess we'll see.
There is a bit of advice I fell compelled to pass on. It comes from someone very adept at psychological warfare. IMHO it should be every anon's mantra:
Protect your mind - control your emotions
If we do that, and focus on our support for President Trump rather than argue about side issues, then we will be doing our part.
Yeah that's great advice. Let me give you a piece of advice from world famous theologian and one of the greatest debaters of all time, Dr James White....
"Never misrepresent people or their positions during a debate or discussion."
Being said where have I displayed any emotions? Did I say I was mad? No. Did I say I was sad? No. Did I say I was angry? No. Did I say I was in love? No.
Trying to dismiss my assertions and counterpoints as emotions is an intellectually dishonest misrepresentation. Discuss and debate based on what is said, not what you would like to perceive in order to strengthen your position.
Or to put it another way..... Thou shalt not lie.