If this is true, then why haven't we seen a quantum leap in Linux OSes, something absolutely groundbreaking? We haven't. We've seen the next logical iteration by HUMANS.
Why hasn't someone had the AI re-written all the ansi c based linux core subsystems in rust, with vast improvements like microcode detection?
I am not sure this isn't creepypasta, but the part about evaluating AI based on free tier shit LLMs is like evaluating smartphones with a flip phone is a point well taken. I've fallen into that trap because I am WHOLLY UNIMPRESSED by leo/qwen LLM, and even with Grok, though Grok is 10x better. Grok fucks up my browser and locks up my entire computer. Not sure how they're doing it, but it betrays the fact that the brave browser on linux has allocated FAR too much memory, cpu and scheduling from the main system to be able to lock up my entire computer from ONE web page (also, javascript fucking sucks and always will.,...ive worked with js for many years, so i know it very very well unfortunately)
I've been out of the tech industry for over a decade so I am not aware of all the changes. I hear about them, I half believe them. I've tried to have free gpts make code and they made something that was 95% functional, but in code, 95 doesn't cut it. It works or doesn't. All or nothing. And so I corrected it, and ran it, but went back and asked the gpt to correct it, and then all it did was continualy refactor the code without actually fixing it; and introduced many new errors. I concluded that it was either incapable of producing real code, OR it was making fake code on purpose because possibly it didn't want schoolchildren to cheat or to mess up the code industry by making real results. This made me angry, and I thought ok, it's all fake and gay then, and I also stopped listening to Zach Vorhies because of it. He was like "wow man this AI is writing code for me and its great" and my experience was the opposite. It was just more hallucination
Obviously, I didn't pay, so maybe that's the problem. Maybe if I pay i can actually have it build interesting things for me. I have some big ideas, and I don't have a decade to build it myself; would be nice for AI to do the heavy lifting. I just don't see it.
But what do I know., I'll take this guy's warning seriously.
If this is true, then why haven't we seen a quantum leap in Linux OSes, something absolutely groundbreaking? We haven't. We've seen the next logical iteration by HUMANS.
Why hasn't someone had the AI re-written all the ansi c based linux core subsystems in rust, with vast improvements like microcode detection?
I am not sure this isn't creepypasta, but the part about evaluating AI based on free tier shit LLMs is like evaluating smartphones with a flip phone is a point well taken. I've fallen into that trap because I am WHOLLY UNIMPRESSED by leo/qwen LLM, and even with Grok, though Grok is 10x better. Grok fucks up my browser and locks up my entire computer. Not sure how they're doing it, but it betrays the fact that the brave browser on linux has allocated FAR too much memory, cpu and scheduling from the main system to be able to lock up my entire computer from ONE web page (also, javascript fucking sucks and always will.,...ive worked with js for many years, so i know it very very well unfortunately)
I've been out of the tech industry for over a decade so I am not aware of all the changes. I hear about them, I half believe them. I've tried to have free gpts make code and they made something that was 95% functional, but in code, 95 doesn't cut it. It works or doesn't. All or nothing. And so I corrected it, and ran it, but went back and asked the gpt to correct it, and then all it did was continualy refactor the code without actually fixing it; and introduced many new errors. I concluded that it was either incapable of producing real code, OR it was making fake code on purpose because possibly it didn't want schoolchildren to cheat or to mess up the code industry by making real results. This made me angry, and I thought ok, it's all fake and gay then, and I also stopped listening to Zach Vorhies because of it. He was like "wow man this AI is writing code for me and its great" and my experience was the opposite. It was just more hallucination
Obviously, I didn't pay, so maybe that's the problem. Maybe if I pay i can actually have it build interesting things for me. I have some big ideas, and I don't have a decade to build it myself; would be nice for AI to do the heavy lifting. I just don't see it.
But what do I know., I'll take this guy's warning seriously.