My guess would be that you'd not only have to get all the stars re-aligned to get the proper people into the right roles at EPA (or any agency, re: any similar situation), but you'd have to go through the entire rule-making process again - which I doubt is easy, nor fast (think typical government bureaucracy.)
The next big lift I see is:
THEN you'd have to go about re-imposing it on the country.
Rules & regulations don't take effect overnight (generally). You have to give people time to comply.
And if you DO try to rush out the imposition of a new rule / regulation too fast, then you get hit with even MORE of my next point:
THEN the biggest issue to re-enactment (as I see it); is your new rule / policy has to survive another huge litany of lawsuits challenging it. And this time there will probably be all different judges hearing your cases (for better or for worse.)
Can anyone correct me if I'm off?
It's amazing what can happen when you think through something for a moment. ππΈπ€£
Genuine question: what is to stop a future admin from re-enforcing the regulations?
The save act, for starters
These are rules & regulations created by a govt bureaucracy; not anything that is voted on by the people in specific. No?
Great question.
My guess would be that you'd not only have to get all the stars re-aligned to get the proper people into the right roles at EPA (or any agency, re: any similar situation), but you'd have to go through the entire rule-making process again - which I doubt is easy, nor fast (think typical government bureaucracy.)
The next big lift I see is:
THEN you'd have to go about re-imposing it on the country.
Rules & regulations don't take effect overnight (generally). You have to give people time to comply.
And if you DO try to rush out the imposition of a new rule / regulation too fast, then you get hit with even MORE of my next point:
THEN the biggest issue to re-enactment (as I see it); is your new rule / policy has to survive another huge litany of lawsuits challenging it. And this time there will probably be all different judges hearing your cases (for better or for worse.)
Can anyone correct me if I'm off?
It's amazing what can happen when you think through something for a moment. ππΈπ€£