Does anyone have any theories as to why these companies are investing so many billions of dollars and yet the one aspect of AI they keep focusing on for some bizarre reason is how much more realistic they can get the generated images or videos to look? Is it so that when the Epstein evidence gets released, they can lie and claim it's AI generated and that the white hats are trying to frame them with "AI fabricated" evidence? But who would they be trying to fool exactly? The American people? I feel like many Americans would be smart enough not to buy that excuse, and you could just as easily argue in the opposite direction that these powerful CEOs invested billions in AI tech companies in order to try and save their asses somehow. But again, how exactly does that prevent them from getting prosecuted?

Are they under the impression that they can fool all the boomers in congress and the boomer judges into believing that the evidence is AI? A guilty verdict can only be handed out if there's no reasonable doubt of guilt. So maybe the existence of AI generated videos and images with some well-placed propaganda can instill enough doubt in judges and juries around the country?

Or maybe they're going to try to use it to frame white hats and attempt to get them prosecuted with fake AI generated evidence?

What do you think the ultimate goal is here?