So long ago I made a post on here about what if the weird wording left by Q in the posts were hints at file names or some kind of coding. I mentioned python or some programming language or the old way files had to be stored.

<these things> and this_kind_of_stuff

I was just using q post #4905 as a random thought test because it was the first one that kinda returned anything from just going down the q drop line, and using "rogue employee" in the Epstein files search. I opened "EFTA01080289.pdf - DataSet 9" since the description intrigued me with WEF as the first word.

All that is, is a resource guide named A Resource Guide to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and it is the EXACT same guide that has redacted parts in the Epstein files. So you can pull this guide up unredacted and compare the two side by side to see what exactly was redacted. And it's not really anything damning per say, it redacts things like U.N., N.W., M&S, cont'd, and a couple links and D.C. and some other little stuff.

The unredacted pdf guide can be found at https://baselgovernance.org/publications/resource-guide-us-foreign-corrupt-practices-act

Anyway, I went to look at the first link that was redacted and the site no longer works. So went to see if it was ever archived, and it was a bunch of times from 2015 to 2024 and heavily from 2022 to 2024 until it was taken offline sometime.

That archived website is https://ogc.commerce.gov/ and one of it's archived snapshots is https://web.archive.org/web/20220222080047/https://ogc.commerce.gov/

I do not really know if this is anything or would lead to anything. But it at least shows an odd redaction method for things that you can easily find elsewhere if you look.

I bring this up in hopes somebody out there has the time and interest in maybe going on this deep dive. Maybe there is something there in relation to the Q drops.