THE FACTS
The Milky Way Galaxy has 100-400 billion stars (suns) Est. 8 trillion planets (Earth is 1) Galaxies Observable Universe: Est. 200-billion to two-trillion galaxies. The milky Way is just one. Faint, un-observable galaxies: 6 to 20 trillion
Knowing this information… well, only fools and idiots could even entertain an idea the earth and its inhabitants are the only living, intelligent species. It is irrational, insane, an indefensible idea that we are alone. We couldn’t be.
In science, the probability of us NOT being alone is a statistical “absolute”! We aren’t alone.
This leads us to only one question: Who, on earth, is preventing us from full disclosure? What are their names? It is time they all stepped aside. Relieve them of all responsibility, all power, all control mechanisms.
Any human being standing against full disclosure is essentially resigning from their post. Relieved of duty. Politely asked to step aside, take a seat and STFU. It’s just time for this.
Anyone disagree?
AI makes it a joke to refute this nonsense. It's too easy.
Key Perspectives and Proponents
Historical Figures: Early proponents of an infinite universe included Willem de Sitter, who proposed the idea in 1917.
Scientific Arguments for Infinity: Flat Geometry: Cosmological measurements of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) suggest the universe has a flat, Euclidean geometry, which strongly implies an infinite spatial extent.
Inflation Theory: Many inflationary models predict that the universe should be vastly larger than the observable portion, potentially stretching to infinity.
Skeptics/Alternative Views: Some scientists, such as Sabine Hossenfelder, George Ellis, and Paul Steinhardt, are more cautious, questioning whether the infinite nature of the universe is scientifically testable or simply metaphysical speculation.
Current Understanding
Observable vs. Total: Scientists distinguish between the observable universe (finite) and the total universe (unknown).
"Effectively" Infinite: Many astronomers consider the universe to be "effectively" infinite, meaning it is so immense that for all practical observational purposes, it is indistinguishable from one that is truly infinite.
Summary While not proven, the concept of an infinite universe is a prevailing theme in modern cosmology, particularly in studies concerning flat spacetime and the inflationary big bang.
You are conflating infinite space with infinite matter and time. The universe is not infinite in past time. There is no indication it is infinite in mass and energy.
The universe is not infinite in future time in the sense that work can continue to be completed. We are headed towards heat death.
You have evidence there was a beginning? How do you know.
It is an inference based off the laws of thermodynamics. The big bang cosmology even recognizes this limit when looking into the past. The universe is unwinding, expanding, and becoming more chaotic. You can only wind the clock back so far. It is not an infinite cyclic phenomena.
By the way look into the clumping of galaxies into threads and superthreads, Major telltale sign the BB is BS. There is no time in your theory to account for it. It's all supposed to be expanding so at what point did they stop and start clumping together? They needed to invent Dark Matter, something that by nature cannot be observed in order to explain it.
Why don't you admit you haven't done your due diligence? It started for me in the 90's with Eric J. Lerner's The Big Bang Never Happened.
Again, AI makes it so easy:
The Electric Universe theory proposes that cosmos-wide electromagnetic forces, rather than just gravity, drive galactic structures, offering a model where energy is constantly recycled, potentially challenging the traditional "heat death" (maximum entropy) scenario. In this view, organized plasma filaments and Birkeland currents suggest ordered, non-equilibrium systems.
Key aspects of Electric Universe theory and entropy:
Energy Recycling: Electric Universe advocates suggest that electrical energy flowing through space prevents the universe from reaching a state of maximum entropy or "heat death," where no more work can be done.
Alternative Cosmologies: While conventional physics relies on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (entropy always increases), Electric Universe theory argues that the universe is not a closed system, allowing for continuous, sustained energy input.
Structured Filaments: Galaxy filaments and cosmic plasma structures are often cited as examples of how electric forces create order, counteracting the tendency toward disorder.
Then why are the Big Bang predictions failing and the Electric Universe predictions are right on? Cosmologists were shocked to find out there are perfectly well-developed galaxies at the edge of our instruments ability to detect objects. Plasma Theory predicted it but the BBT says there should be nothing as bright and mature in the "Early Universe 13.8 billion years ago." I think that number is absurdly recent and I bet it will be shown to be extremely ignorant in our lifetime.