Opinion: I see dodgy and clicky material from RealRobert all the time.
Case in point: Oltmann mentions Pompeo's counsel, but it is RealRobert who inserts, in brackets: "Pompeo's (CIA Director) Counsel"
Pompeo was head of CIA between early 2017 to late April 2018. At the time Oltmann is talking about, Pompeo was Secretary of State.
So either RR is just really bad at research and will write anything that goes with his biases, or he deliberately creates or embellishes facts to spin a selected narrative.
RR:
In other words, the CIA toppled the U.S. government on November 3, 2020.
He's stating his conclusion here, NOT what Oltmann actually said.
We know the election was stolen, but not exactly by who or when, etc. We know a lot, but not all.
"The CIA did it" is an easy shot, great for garnering clicks from our crowd, but it's RR's assertion and conclusion, and he doesn't provide any direct evidence except for (falsely) labeling Pompeo as CIA director at the time.
Also, OP u/madmax2/ Oltmann clearly states that the guy sweating is Pompeo's counsel, and says NOTHING about Pompeo himself 'sweating'.
Many of us often quote the idea that the takedown must be done right, correctly, by the book. It has to stick. Well, the same applies to our research and info-sharing. RealRobert generated spin, and then you amplified it by erroneously posting "Pompeo sweats".
Regardless of how dirty Pompeo is, this approach to information screws things up, because it contains key falsehoods.
How credible is this guy?
a) RealRobert
b) Joe Oltmann
Opinion: I see dodgy and clicky material from RealRobert all the time.
Case in point: Oltmann mentions Pompeo's counsel, but it is RealRobert who inserts, in brackets: "Pompeo's (CIA Director) Counsel"
Pompeo was head of CIA between early 2017 to late April 2018. At the time Oltmann is talking about, Pompeo was Secretary of State.
So either RR is just really bad at research and will write anything that goes with his biases, or he deliberately creates or embellishes facts to spin a selected narrative.
RR:
He's stating his conclusion here, NOT what Oltmann actually said.
We know the election was stolen, but not exactly by who or when, etc. We know a lot, but not all.
"The CIA did it" is an easy shot, great for garnering clicks from our crowd, but it's RR's assertion and conclusion, and he doesn't provide any direct evidence except for (falsely) labeling Pompeo as CIA director at the time.
Also, OP u/madmax2/ Oltmann clearly states that the guy sweating is Pompeo's counsel, and says NOTHING about Pompeo himself 'sweating'.
Many of us often quote the idea that the takedown must be done right, correctly, by the book. It has to stick. Well, the same applies to our research and info-sharing. RealRobert generated spin, and then you amplified it by erroneously posting "Pompeo sweats".
Regardless of how dirty Pompeo is, this approach to information screws things up, because it contains key falsehoods.
Let's do better.
I was talking about Oltman. The part where he talked about Pense.
I don't give two fuks either way Robert.