28
posted ago by RealityIsBroken ago by RealityIsBroken +28 / -0

Still watching and have been looking up random bits throughout when I heard Trump say what sounded like "possol" and then quickly corrected with possible".

Unfortunately I didn't get a timestamp, tried rewinding a bit but no dice.

Edit: Timestamp found on RSBN YT for timestamp linkability 1:19:24

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WqMf4g-JGUQ&t=4765s

Any who, POSSOL turns up two hits that look interesting but not sure what they are. Both at OSTI.gov and for a "poisson equation solver".

Looking up WTF poisson is and two hits went from interesting to dasting.

First link is Page not found:

https://www.osti.gov/biblio/139047

Was able to pull it up on the web archive this morning, last night kept timing out.

https://web.archive.org/web/20250209015946/https://www.osti.gov/biblio/139047

Search result title: POSSOL. Nonlinear Grid Poisson Equation Solver (Technical Report)

Second link:

https://www.osti.gov/biblio/5001688

Search result title: POSSOL Poisson equation solver (Technical Report)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisson_distribution

It's late and I'm tired, but this seems like something.

Still a little tired, but any thoughts? This mispronunciation was when speaking of the dead bodies recovered from HAMAS.

From the archive link above:

POSSOL is a two-dimensional Poisson equation solver for problems with arbitrary non-uniform gridding in Cartesian coordinates. POSSOL will solve the Helmholtz equation on an arbitrary, non-uniform grid on a rectangular domain allowing only one type of boundary condition on any one side. It can also be used to handle more than one type of boundary condition on a side by means of a capacitance matrix technique. There are three types of boundary conditions that can be applied: fixed, derivative, or periodic.

Might be nothing, but seems like it could be something.

Edit: I do realize this could entirely be just a miss-speak. While I appreciate comments this is for discussing the possibility of it being intentional so no need to point out the contrary.