So? Might mean something, might not mean anything. At best that could be a reason to keep digging, but in itself it's mostly a nothing burger.
Plus that "short hair, dressed as a boy" - well, she might have gone through a tomboy phase. So maybe just means that she is lucky to be old enough that her "I like boy stuff more and to play like a boy" didn't lead to assumptions that she was trans and then to surgery and hormone therapy treatments. I liked to play with boys more than with girls when I was between 5 and 7 years old, and it stopped mostly after I entered school only because the boys I had been playing with were teased about their "girlfriend" and stopped playing with me, and I still liked to dress in boy clothes more than girl ones most of my childhood because they were easier to do tomboy stuff in than girl clothes. And I had longer hair mostly just because my mother liked it, not because I did. I would probably have gotten a buzz cut at that age if she had approved of it. I got really interested in pretty clothes, jewelry and my hair only after I entered my teen years.
Haven't we now been forced to keep on arguing that that kind of tomboy behavior does NOT make girls into boys now for years? Why does Candace seem to assume that it might mean Erika is actually male now?
I used to like Candace, but she seems to be more focused on things that don't really MEAN all that much in the bigger picture for some years now. Sure, maybe things like "is she really male?" about some individuals is scandalous, maybe, if they are, a sign of cultural rot, but it's still not that significant (with Macron, the bigger question about his wife might be "did she groom him from his teens - well, yes - and how much can she still affect his decisions?").
While yes, things like election fraud and actual crimes, especially ones which might help to get rid of them, maybe committed by people who are in positions of power, would be much more important issues right now.
I also used to like Candace, especially when testifying as a "conservative" during the congressional hearing, when she annihilated the buffoon, Ted Lieu, after showing her a clip of a prior remark she made about Adolf Hilter. I can watch that over and over, watching that buffoon's face. But, like Tucker, she has the devil's "claw marks" resulting from the devil's attack. Praying for her repentance.
So? Might mean something, might not mean anything. At best that could be a reason to keep digging, but in itself it's mostly a nothing burger.
Plus that "short hair, dressed as a boy" - well, she might have gone through a tomboy phase. So maybe just means that she is lucky to be old enough that her "I like boy stuff more and to play like a boy" didn't lead to assumptions that she was trans and then to surgery and hormone therapy treatments. I liked to play with boys more than with girls when I was between 5 and 7 years old, and it stopped mostly after I entered school only because the boys I had been playing with were teased about their "girlfriend" and stopped playing with me, and I still liked to dress in boy clothes more than girl ones most of my childhood because they were easier to do tomboy stuff in than girl clothes. And I had longer hair mostly just because my mother liked it, not because I did. I would probably have gotten a buzz cut at that age if she had approved of it. I got really interested in pretty clothes, jewelry and my hair only after I entered my teen years.
Haven't we now been forced to keep on arguing that that kind of tomboy behavior does NOT make girls into boys now for years? Why does Candace seem to assume that it might mean Erika is actually male now?
I used to like Candace, but she seems to be more focused on things that don't really MEAN all that much in the bigger picture for some years now. Sure, maybe things like "is she really male?" about some individuals is scandalous, maybe, if they are, a sign of cultural rot, but it's still not that significant (with Macron, the bigger question about his wife might be "did she groom him from his teens - well, yes - and how much can she still affect his decisions?").
While yes, things like election fraud and actual crimes, especially ones which might help to get rid of them, maybe committed by people who are in positions of power, would be much more important issues right now.
I also used to like Candace, especially when testifying as a "conservative" during the congressional hearing, when she annihilated the buffoon, Ted Lieu, after showing her a clip of a prior remark she made about Adolf Hilter. I can watch that over and over, watching that buffoon's face. But, like Tucker, she has the devil's "claw marks" resulting from the devil's attack. Praying for her repentance.