Quite an essay.

This stood out to me:

“ The U.S.-Israel relationship will be treated as a negotiable interest rather than a biblical imperative. The Judeo-Christian vocabulary that every Republican president since Reagan has used will have been replaced by Christian civilization — which means something entirely different.”

I think it IS a negotiable interest.

Dan Bongino mentions this article in his podcast

Here's an important clip from the article:

The foreign policy critique at the heart of the Carlson-Fuentes-Bannon messaging — that American resources have been squandered on foreign commitments that do not serve ordinary Americans — is a version, however distorted, of something Trump ran on and won on. The critique of neoconservatism — of the Bush-era foreign policy consensus that took America into Iraq and Afghanistan — is a legitimate critique that a significant majority of Americans, including a significant majority of Republicans, now share.

It is deliberate subterfuge that the opposition conflate Trump's action with the neocons.

Every single Roman general knew that to take the nations youth, armor and treasury off to war and fail to bring back the loot to Rome would result in the Roman Emperor hanging him - or worse.

After decades of "American" neocons and socialists doing so - well that just one pf many reasons Trump is president . The perps have yet to pay for what they have done to impoverish America and Americans in their useless overseas adventures.