From the article -- the major question.
The question you have to ask... the honest question, not the Tucker question, not the Marjorie question, the real question... is this... Could Donald Trump have achieved a permanent, lasting America First posture... the real Donroe Doctrine, the thing we all voted for... without first clearing the board of the existential threats that previous administrations allowed to metastasize for decades?
Dan Bongino mentions this article in his podcast
Here's an important clip from the article:
The foreign policy critique at the heart of the Carlson-Fuentes-Bannon messaging — that American resources have been squandered on foreign commitments that do not serve ordinary Americans — is a version, however distorted, of something Trump ran on and won on. The critique of neoconservatism — of the Bush-era foreign policy consensus that took America into Iraq and Afghanistan — is a legitimate critique that a significant majority of Americans, including a significant majority of Republicans, now share.
It is deliberate subterfuge that the opposition conflate Trump's action with the neocons.
This tweet is misleading. Clearly, that is why Daugherty quoted the word "accepted". Pahlavi is making his own proclamation without the affirmation of the Iranian people. Even President Trump is quite skeptical of Pahlavi having stated what while Pahlavi is a "good man" he'd prefer someone who has been living in Iran accepted by the Iranian people rather than someone who's been living outside of the country. It is clear with with the Mullahs taken out that the Deep State would find Pahlavi their acceptable choice.
Pulte got her out.