I used something called discernment. Why don't you have any?
The point of the OP is not about his individual minor conclusion(s)
It's not a minor conclusion though, is it? If Trump were to initiate a draft tomorrow, do you think it would be a minor issue, or THE defining issue of his entire presidency? That's a rhetorical question.
Valuable insight can be gained from people even if you don't agree with
And that tosses discernment right out the window. Continuing to listen to someone who is wrong because they might eventually say something right is ridiculous.
He can wrong about a DRAFT, and a few other points inconsequential to the BIG PICTURE, but STILL be correct regarding the overarching theme: Eschatology informs one of what to expect.
That was the point of the OP.
The mods were intelligent enough to parse that without me needing to explain it to them like they are five.
Probably because they have good reading/listening comprehension.
I know you think it's just a hollow insult, but I mean it when I say that if you had better comprehension skills then you wouldn't have all these problems understanding things adults talk about.
Thanks for letting me have the last word.
He can wrong about a DRAFT, and a few other points inconsequential
when I say that if you had better comprehension skills
You think it's inconsequential when bad information precedes good information. That's why you would flippantly predict a tidal wave and have this confused pikachu face when many discount everything you say thereafter.
That's your whole schtick. Flood the market with information, some good some bad, let things stick to the wall when it can (yay me I get praised) and disregard all criticism when you're wrong.
Alex Jones has a job. His job is to mix the truth with such a ridiculous persona that people will not believe the truth if for no other reason than it came from the mouth of someone so ridiculous.
Well your friend you posted a link to, his opinion on the draft is so out there and ridiculous that nothing else he says should be given a grain of salt. It does the truth no favors to be conflated with lies and ridiculousness.
I used something called discernment. Why don't you have any?
It's not a minor conclusion though, is it? If Trump were to initiate a draft tomorrow, do you think it would be a minor issue, or THE defining issue of his entire presidency? That's a rhetorical question.
And that tosses discernment right out the window. Continuing to listen to someone who is wrong because they might eventually say something right is ridiculous.
He can wrong about a DRAFT, and a few other points inconsequential to the BIG PICTURE, but STILL be correct regarding the overarching theme: Eschatology informs one of what to expect.
That was the point of the OP.
The mods were intelligent enough to parse that without me needing to explain it to them like they are five.
Probably because they have good reading/listening comprehension.
I know you think it's just a hollow insult, but I mean it when I say that if you had better comprehension skills then you wouldn't have all these problems understanding things adults talk about.
Thanks for letting me have the last word.
You think it's inconsequential when bad information precedes good information. That's why you would flippantly predict a tidal wave and have this confused pikachu face when many discount everything you say thereafter.
That's your whole schtick. Flood the market with information, some good some bad, let things stick to the wall when it can (yay me I get praised) and disregard all criticism when you're wrong.
Alex Jones has a job. His job is to mix the truth with such a ridiculous persona that people will not believe the truth if for no other reason than it came from the mouth of someone so ridiculous.
Well your friend you posted a link to, his opinion on the draft is so out there and ridiculous that nothing else he says should be given a grain of salt. It does the truth no favors to be conflated with lies and ridiculousness.