Unless the so-called hijackers were highly skilled and practiced in the maneuver, probably not. Professional pilots have conducted experiments in flight simulators and come to the conclusion that the flight paths into the twin towers were very difficult. They were also not paths a pilot would select under manual control, if tasked with such a suicide assignment.
A recent talk investigating this: "Preliminary Evaluation of Flight Simulator Data Concerning the Control of UA175 and AA77" by Dr. Piers Robinson, at Turning the Tide 2025 Conference.
A more likely explanation is that the planes were swapped out mid-flight with remote controlled jets under military control, with the original commercial planes likely diverted to an air force base for disposal. This is the plane replacement hypothesis.
Unless the so-called hijackers were highly skilled and practiced in the maneuver, probably not. Professional pilots have conducted experiments in flight simulators and come to the conclusion that the flight paths into the twin towers were very difficult. They were also not paths a pilot would select under manual control, if tasked with such a suicide assignment.
A recent talk investigating this: "Preliminary Evaluation of Flight Simulator Data Concerning the Control of UA175 and AA77" by Dr. Piers Robinson, at Turning the Tide 2025 Conference.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNHWKqTCACI&t=14626s
A more likely explanation is that the planes were swapped out mid-flight with remote controlled jets under military control, with the original commercial planes likely diverted to an air force base for disposal. This is the plane replacement hypothesis.